Motherof5
Active Member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2008
- Messages
- 1,366
- Reaction score
- 29
I agree that it sounds like the police are calling out someone specific without giving their name. This could be an ex-wife or old girlfriend?
However, I still can't figure out why the police would say other family members are involved unless 1) they had very good proof and 2) EVERY family member was involved. Suppose Richard and I (Steve) were Welch's two uncles. If I was the one who helped Welch, Richard would have a good case of slander against the police. If we were both innocent, we both would have a good case of slander against the police. Being accused of involvement in a double child murder is not an accusation one should make lightly because it could ruin someone's life.
I am not an expert in police procedure, but don't they usually say something vague like, "We know who did it and are gathering more evidence." I can't recall hearing the police say to the press, "Steve did it, but we just don't have enough evidence yet." Saying, "We know either Steve and/or Richard was the murder," seems damaging to the innocent party and an invitation to a lawsuit. Perhaps the police just misspoke and he should have said a vague, "We know Welch had help and we know who helped him."
I don't think they misspoke because it wasn't just one officer saying it. MCPD said Welch and family members and the VA cop said we know who is responsible...each and every one of them. They are being very careful not to name any of Welch's family members...yet. They are also sending the family members a very clear message when they do give updates....We're coming for you!! I agree 100% that those are very strong words and they have never used words like that in this case..... ever. They also haven't spent over a week searching one area with all the equipment and specialists that they are using now. They are all in and I pray they find the girls.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk