seguek9
3rd generation Wiccan-verified Peace Keeper
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2013
- Messages
- 3,141
- Reaction score
- 1
Thank you!
BTW I chose the Shrike for JA because of the inhumane way they deal with their prey.....
It depends on what she said and to how many other jurors.
Then again, we have seen the defense twist and manipulate testimony to their own needs so maybe what was uttered in the sealed meeting doesn't really amount to juror misconduct.
She could have said something that doesn't really rise to the level of juror misconduct but did not display body language that they liked. Especially since Jodi would have been just feet from the juror.
Why do people think it is tri color? Just curious....and lazy.
Or 1.4 million dollars!!!!!IMO, if another juror(s) said something about #5, it was because they take there instructions seriously and do not want to have wasted the last few months of their time.
Why do people think it is tri color? Just curious....and lazy.
The witness who testified about enhancing the video stated that it was compared to known samples.
where are you hearing that ? TIA
ETA: just found this from a FB page
Beth Kara's just reported that this juror (#5) made a "bias comment" in front of other juror and probably was ratted out by another juror or two. What is concerning to me is that other jurors would rat her out if the believed in JA guilt. Why would ANYONE believe in her innocence at this point. Beth Karas also said its highly unlikely there'll be a mistrial. Thank God
IMO, if another juror(s) said something about #5, it was because they take there instructions seriously and do not want to have wasted the last few months of their time.
If am interpreting correctly, during the sealed in chambers questioning of all the jurors due to Nurmi's concern that Juan Martinez was guilty of Prosecutorial misconduct for posing for a few snapshots with people one time, Juror #5 said something in front of other jurors that was biased towards the Prosecution and unfavorable to Mz. Arias. (Juror #5 either said something during the interview with the judge, or the fact that Juror #5 had said something was raised by another juror to the judge).
Good luck with that, Nurmi & Willmott.
You would think the Judge would have addressed the issue when it happened. I think the defense is grabbing in the dark for anything they might be able to get for a mistrial. Maybe if they did get a mistrial, Nurmi could have himself removed from the case, since this is what he has wanted for a long time. Court should have released him long ago when he requested it.
Breath in..... Hold it. Hold or a little more. Exhale...slow..all the way out. .aaahh.
Better?
There are other jurors right? 17 I think.
Like, "I can't believe this BS," meaning the need for a hearing about someone signing an autograph. Hummm??? So, then could heavy sighing be considered misconduct? Where does it end?It depends on what she said and to how many other jurors.
Then again, we have seen the defense twist and manipulate testimony to their own needs so maybe what was uttered in the sealed meeting doesn't really amount to juror misconduct.
She could have said something that doesn't really rise to the level of juror misconduct but did not display body language that they liked. Especially since Jodi would have been just feet from the juror.
Um...sex acts sure don't seem to make my husband "more alert.":floorlaugh: (I mean that he is alert until right after the event/s!)
<Respectfully snipped.
Were the attorneys in the room when the jurors were questioned? And if they weren't, I am wondering how anyone other than the judge knows what was said in that interview.
Also I thought they were being interviewed individually. I think it sounds weird and maybe there was some other misconduct somewhere. Thanks for the link. jmo