What is ETA.........as it's not estimated time arrival........ty
What is ETA.........as it's not estimated time arrival........ty
I know this is a dumb question, and I'm sure it will get lost due to the new info about a mistrial, but I'm going to ask it anyway. Why do we believe that is Travis on the sex tape? It doesn't sound like the same person that we hear on the tapes where we see him. Travis didn't use drugs or alcohol, and it sounds like a man who is either drunk or on something powerful. I'm sure Juan wouldn't agree that it's Travis unless it was, but something is very strange about his speech on that sex tape. I'm sure this has been addressed before, but I'm late in getting here, and I may have missed it. Am I the only one that has a problem believing this is Travis?
Why? They have alternates, yes? Don't they just dismiss that juror and go on from that?? No court but still having motions today?
What is ETA.........as it's not estimated time arrival........ty
IIRC, there was a guy in the Scott Peterson case that got dismissed. He talked to anyone that would listen!
What is ETA.........as it's not estimated time arrival........ty
What is ETA.........as it's not estimated time arrival........ty
Iirc....this would be the 3rd or 4th motion for a mistrial...correct?
I know this is a dumb question, and I'm sure it will get lost due to the new info about a mistrial, but I'm going to ask it anyway. Why do we believe that is Travis on the sex tape? It doesn't sound like the same person that we hear on the tapes where we see him. Travis didn't use drugs or alcohol, and it sounds like a man who is either drunk or on something powerful. I'm sure Juan wouldn't agree that it's Travis unless it was, but something is very strange about his speech on that sex tape. I'm sure this has been addressed before, but I'm late in getting here, and I may have missed it. Am I the only one that has a problem believing this is Travis?
I know this is a dumb question, and I'm sure it will get lost due to the new info about a mistrial, but I'm going to ask it anyway. Why do we believe that is Travis on the sex tape? It doesn't sound like the same person that we hear on the tapes where we see him. Travis didn't use drugs or alcohol, and it sounds like a man who is either drunk or on something powerful. I'm sure Juan wouldn't agree that it's Travis unless it was, but something is very strange about his speech on that sex tape. I'm sure this has been addressed before, but I'm late in getting here, and I may have missed it. Am I the only one that has a problem believing this is Travis?
The motion for a mistrial for juror misconduct stemmed from the motion for mistrial for prosecutor misconduct!!! :banghead:
What about defense/defendant misconduct!!!
UGH!
Or...there's a juror who takes their job seriously and just stated what they had seen/heard. From what was said on HLN, the judge could simply ask the other jurors if they could ignore what was said and come to their own conclusions regardless.That's what I'm worried about. If a juror heard it and thinks Jodi is innocent, they may want her off the jury.
Well, its all really speculative. We cannot know for certain, the info was just released.
LOL! and my source is my husband who texted me what they said on HLN!!!
I know this is a dumb question, and I'm sure it will get lost due to the new info about a mistrial, but I'm going to ask it anyway. Why do we believe that is Travis on the sex tape? It doesn't sound like the same person that we hear on the tapes where we see him. Travis didn't use drugs or alcohol, and it sounds like a man who is either drunk or on something powerful. I'm sure Juan wouldn't agree that it's Travis unless it was, but something is very strange about his speech on that sex tape. I'm sure this has been addressed before, but I'm late in getting here, and I may have missed it. Am I the only one that has a problem believing this is Travis?