Blink34
Former Member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2008
- Messages
- 5,476
- Reaction score
- 9
Ok I have read that 3x and dont see anywhere where he makes such an accusation. All it means is that there is a mitichondrial match, which excludes the male chromosome for comparison. Mr. Padilla is not a foresnsics expert that I am aware and he was either confused or misquoted or both.
Respectfully, I am not a fan of starting threads with unconfirmed information on a person who could be damaged by such a rumor. Anyone else in this family is fair game.