I HAVE SERIOUS SERIOUS ISSUES WITH MR. PADILLA and all the theories he is throwing out on tv interviews
1. The most dangerous thing is that people - including me - believe he has some insight knowledge of things and his views hold sometimes serious consideration. It is very irresponsible on his behalf to go on tv and throw right and left suggestiong about people and events when he has no facts about it.
2. I am still waiting for him to apologise to Amy and Tony, because at the first days he became attached to this story and he believed Caylee was alive he DID photographed these two people as being possible suspects.
3. NOW LAST NIGHT: On Nancy Grace, a reporter had an exclusive interview with Tony and Tony told her that he picked up Casey middle day from Amscot's parking lot. Cayse had groceries with her. Padilla interrupts and says (I am not quoting exact words): OH OH then your reporter needs to go back to Tony and ask him why the witness from Ascot said that she noticed Casey's car abandoned as early as 7 in the morning. Padilla made it seem as if Tony was untruthful with his account of what happened. I FIND PADILLA'S SIMPLISTIC ANALYSIS OF EVENTS VERY DANGEROUS in relation to publicly castin suspicions on people who so far we have no evidence they have been untruthful or uncooperative with LE, or that they had any involvement in this.
One easy explanation confirming Tony was telling the truth: Casey went to Amscot at night, dumped Caylee or whatever in the dumpster, abandoned her car, and returned the next day by foot or taxi, she did some shopping and called Tony to pick her up. Building up her alibi. She was there during the day to shop and she run out of gaz. She wasn't there in dark midnight getting rid of evidence. So returns the next day, do some shopping, and then call boyfriend to serve as a witness to her whereabouts. Is this so difficult for Mr. Padilla to think? After all it is more likely that Caylee dumped any evidence on night not in the morning. And she couldn't exactly excuse why she was at Amscot's late at night calling Tony to pick her up. I think it is dangerous the way Mr. Padilla is behaving cause he makes it seem that he has super insighter info and what he says changes viewer's minds. And I find it very irresponsible the way he insists on throwing suspicions around on people.
4. And if his wild theory that Caylee was the child of Lee and Casey (even if it came in the form of a question it is still a very bad thing to insinuate unless you have some proof) is only based on his basic understanding of DNA, then he should just stop appearing on TV. Lee can easily sue him for such a hurtful insinuation.