SOLVED MA - Jane Britton, 22, Harvard student, Cambridge, 7 Jan 1969

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
The first I heard about this case was in Susan Kelly's 1995 book about the Boston Strangler that I read about 12 years ago. She was not suggesting that Jane was a victim of Boston S.; only she was comparing this to one of his previous murders.
 
Are there any crime scene photographs available in the case? Has the nightgown been described? I'm interested if she was wearing one for comfort or the type she might wear for some intimate plan.

Snipped for space.

Everything you've said has a really good point - just how well did the killer and Jane know each other? You may be on to something and maybe the killer was a friend of hers or someone who lived in the building.

I just wanted to point out a few things however. I'm underlining the main questions and then adding my explanation for asking that.

What was the etiquette around this in the 60s?

I know people were more conservative about things like being seen in their night clothes in general so I'm wondering specifically about young people and university students.

Based on my own experience and that of my friends (not in the 60s - we weren't even born then - but within the last 10 or so years) for us it would be normal to wear our PJs in front of friends. If we're sharing a dorm or house with people then of course it's normal. If they're friends it's definitely normal especially if they drop by very early or very late. I'd find it uncomfortable if it was a stranger but if it was a classmate, someone I knew and saw every day even if weren't close, then if they dropped by late I wouldn't feel very self-conscious because what did they expect me to be wearing instead of PJs.

Did Jane's living space include a living room? What was the etiquette among people of Jane's age of inviting people into sleeping rooms?

For example if the perp had borrowed a book from Jane and she was giving it back, would the perp be waiting in a living room or would it be normal for him or her to follow Jane to her room? The book is merely an example of course, it could be a music record she wanted to hand over to the perp or to play for them to listen, a souvenir from her trips she wanted to show, and so on.

If there was a living room then it would make more sense for a stranger to wait there unless he surprised Jane by following her or unless he was getting something like a book from her. Maybe even someone she knew but not well. If there wasn't a living room then sitting in her room talking would make sense for either scenario.

If it would have been odd to invite someone who was a classmate but not a good friend, or if it would have been weird to sit and talk (just that, I'm not implying anything more than that, mind you) in a bedroom with a guy then I think it may give us a hint about the perp's most likely identity.

How were the acoustics in the living room if there was one? Were conversations or screams coming from that room more audible to the people who lived next door?

If yes and the perp knew that then maybe the perp may have threatened her to go to a part of the house where it would be harder for someone else to hear her if she called for help OR if they were having a normal conversation before he murdered her, maybe they didn't want to be talking loudly at a late hour and annoy everyone else.


Another thing I'd like to point out, I don't believe that the nightgown was a sexy lingerie type thing.

If that was the case then IMO people would have made a bigger deal of it, at least the press in the early stages of reporting. It would also have made people focus a lot more on her boyfriend as people would probably believe that either he was lying about having left when he said he did or people would think she was cheating.

Someone trying to protect the murderer would also have made a bigger deal of it, we know how society is unfortunately when it comes to blaming women for crimes committed against them, someone trying to protect the perp would have tried to make this a bigger focus than the real point of catching the perp and would try to deflect attention on to her boyfriend and even gossip.

(I don't believe Jane was cheating, as she sounds like she was happy with her boyfriend, and IMO she sounds like the type of person who would have simply broken up with him if she was unhappy. And I don't find it so likely that her boyfriend did it.)

IMO the nightgown wasn't so remarkable which explains why we might know it was blue but not much else about it.

:twocents:
 
I think 1969 would qualify as part of the swinging sixties; the sexual revolution was in high gear by then - maybe even more so than now without HIV and all that. The "swinging sixties" is actually a bit of a misnomer since the early 60s (without the birth control pill) were really more like the 1950s than they were like the late sixties.
 
I think 1969 would qualify as part of the swinging sixties; the sexual revolution was in high gear by then - maybe even more so than now without HIV and all that. The "swinging sixties" is actually a bit of a misnomer since the early 60s (without the birth control pill) were really more like the 1950s than they were like the late sixties.

The 60s began for real on February 9 of 1964 when the Beatles first appeared on the Ed Sullivan Show.
 
I live in Boston, and dated a Harvard anthropologist for a while. The inside word is that she was probably murdered by someone currently on the faculty...

Yes; I went to Harvard Grad School of Arts & Sciences in the eighties and had friends who were Anthropology grad students. They said that the victim had been involved on the side with a married man who was a professor or other high-level Harvard employee, associated with or in Anthropology.

<modsnip>

They mentioned that it happened around the time of this young woman's PhD Qualifying Examinations, when she was under a lot of stress. She may have threatened to reveal their affair, and he was desperate to silence her.
 
I don't really see what she had to gain by exposing an affair, if she was actually having one. Anything is possible but it would seem to me that she stood to lose far more than she could possibly gain from such a revelation.
 
There were many situations at Harvard back then involving women being pressured or harassed into affairs with faculty who had some say over their careers. I personally knew two women who were pressured for sexual favors by their faculty advisors. Eventually some of these women spoke out against their abusers.

Other than to protest abuse, what could motivate a woman to reveal an affair? In order to break up his marriage, of course, but I think this case had more to do with a graduate student in a vulnerable position with one of her professors. At any rate, that part is of somewhat lesser importance.
 
From various conversations I've had, it's clear to me that Jane was vulnerable to older men, and it would not have been out of character for her to have had an affair with one, and perhaps been a bit obsessive over him, as some romantic-minded young women tend to be.

And if there was a man with a lot to lose over it, illustrious career, family..
 
Just a thought here.

Why do we think the killer is male? Could be female.

Could be a jealous wife, classmate, friend, or an out of their mind random student that was lost in grief of having been harmed or lost a friend because of the lack of security at the buildings and the ongoing struggle to force a more secure setting.

All the clothes being tossed upon her could also suggest a female, maybe trying to cover the body, or trying to find a particular item of clothing, or rapid thoughts thinking that piles of clothes may look like a robbery....Most definitely women have been known to randomly dig through and toss to the side, lots of clothes.
 
I tend to think 'male' because I believe Jane was raped, or interfered with in some sexual way-- though there's at least two female POIs on my radar in this case, and one's a potentially jealous wife.
 
The police banned all information about this case and still do to this day. Wow. This guy must be a very important person or someone with connections. Her father was well placed at the university and this ban even managed to suppress him. Very strange.

So many bits of information indicate that people know what happened but no one speaks out. Shame. Jane deserves better.

Bumping for Jane. Her killer is still out there.

moo
 
There are people still alive who know much more about this case than they are willing to tell. It's sad.

Bumping for Jane. She lost her life. Those who know have lived on.

moo
 
Re: Death of Jane's father

J. Boyd Britton, 93, former vice president of Radcliffe College and the Boston-based Cabot Corp., died Oct. 15 in Vero Beach, Fla. The former Needham resident had Alzheimer's disease.

"My dad laughed . . . golfed intently, tinkered incurably, kidded gently, [and] avoided what he called the `slopjar' in life and language," said his son, Boyd R. Britton of North Hollywood, Calif.

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-7746571.html
I don't want to lose this comment. I'm just trying to go through this thread & my 'little grey cells' are too old to remember.
 
PP, this is going to be a long night for me. She could have been me. Same interests. Same area. My infant son prevented my leaving for the area. (Actually, that & the fact that my archaeology prof found my attempts at initial Arabic to be..lacking) The one person I could ask for more info is deceased. This is the one thread I understand.
 
Okay, forgive me for babbling a bit here, I just lost a family member and I'm on WS to keep myself occupied and haven't had much sleep... but here goes...

Ravi was not in Harvard when that drug deal went down. He was instrumental in setting it up, though, but had to leave the country perhaps, in 69 and continue from wherever he went (including India, where he was busted).

Now, Ravi's dad was a huge bigwig in India... and internationally, too, here he is on Wiki:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IndRikhyear_Jit_Rikhye

Indar Rikhye left the UN in 1969 or '70, my guess being the scandalous behaviour of his son gave him a nudge there... I have to check the timing..

Anyway. Ravi -was- at Harvard when Jane was murdered. He was gallivanting about in aeroplanes (the article hinted it wasn't quite kosher, that stint of his 'long flight', either) and was notorious among his peers for off-kilter behaviour. "One of the wilder characters to pass through Harvard," was how one student put it. Right up there with Leary, perhaps.

Now, I don't have the article in front of me, as I accidentally just closed the damn thing, but there was --another-- massive drug bust a couple years after Ravi's, featuring a few of the exact same people as Ravi's -- only this one was wayyy more massive and convoluted, involved a dozen countries and several ships, and it seemed to me a LOT of dangerous folk were involved in it.

Maybe Ravi had been helping them smuggle drugs for a while before they got nabbed? Maybe the run he was busted for was a test run for the bigger ones to come, who knows...

But he -did- know some awfully big time criminals, and here's his neighbour murdered. Not raped, or anything. Just hit in the face (she had bruises on her face) and then smashed with (maybe) a rock.

And here's Ravi, hearing none of it, but vigilantly noting an idling car outside, into which two men suspiciously ran and took off.

Because.. what. Two men leave a car idling in the street to both get out, run up a fire escape, smack a girl around a bit and cave her head in with a rock, stage the murder scene to look like something archeology-related, perhaps, then run back down the fire escape and make their getaway --- why, exactly?

Almost exactly one year after Jane's death, Ravi's left Harvard and is in India, being nabbed for smuggling tons of hash.

One article calls him a "drug lord" and he was apparently still wanted in 2005, as I mentioned before. Yet he is openly living in Maryland, then, for some reason trying quite specifically to get a job teaching in Catholic schools. Finding Ravi was not hard at all. I did it in what? 10 minutes. But India can't? Anyhow, this is what they said in an article I linked earlier:



So there's his shock-horror 1970 arrest that would have severely embarrassed his entire Very Prominent family and that of his preppy American wife.. Pamela, who was married to him back then.

So Ravi was known to be arranging massive drug deals from -- Rome. And other international hideouts. Prior to 1970, which puts him at Harvard and very likely supplying the entire population of Massachusetts with hash during the Summer of Love and beyond.

Robin Hood - your question "did Jane see something.." is somewhat more concrete in my mind, now. And I'm eyeballing Ravi and/or his hardcore druglord pals real hard.

ETA: I meant to add: and there's your reason for the media blackout, perhaps? Was Jane's murder a fly in the ointment for the CIA and FBI (who were hanging around a lot, getting info from Jessie Gill..) if they were watching Ravi in the hope of making a sting?

It all sort of fell together in my mind, just now. Might be nothing. But it might be something.
Don't want to lose this either...the hash comment
 
Robin Hood -

I was intrigued by this as well (especially once I started searching for information on Ravi) but it doesn't fit the scenario described in Jane's room. A neanderthal/persian burial rite is much more in line with the bits that one can discern from the newspapers.
Neanderthal-Persian ok so I can't do notes & cook at same time. Give an old woman a break. This is sounding like a bipolar nite. If only I were, then I could do this for days & then crash.
 
and another PP view

Sayers Bunbury, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Frank Erwin Bunbury, was married today to Ravi Inder Lal Rikhye, son of Maj. ... William Bates Cobb was best man.

edited to add, could also be him -Dr. William Bates Cobb, MD, Saint George Infectious Disease Specialist. Graduated Howard University College of ..

And another possible connection http://books.google.co.uk/books/about/An_Oldish_Pretty_Girl.html?id=ZAAhOgAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
He graduated from Howard?? D.C. Howard? Oh sorry, I'll be doing this for hours.
 
Have a read here

Career Girls Murders - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Just to add - ''Jessie L. Gill, the FBI informer...

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1973/4/24/gill-says-intelligence-groups-were-ineffective/

''Jessie L. Gill informed on Harvard and Cambridge SDS for the FBI between 1967 and 1970''

http://wwww.thecrimson.net/article/1973/4/24/a-conspiracy-plays-with-cambridge-pbcbruelty/

A good reason for a news blackout ?
Save this too...informant
 
I live in Boston, and dated a Harvard anthropologist for a while. The inside word is that she was probably murdered by someone currently on the faculty...
Although it's 2014 can you be verified as an insider?
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
127
Guests online
1,626
Total visitors
1,753

Forum statistics

Threads
605,897
Messages
18,194,488
Members
233,626
Latest member
BecStar
Back
Top