CourtandSims4
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2024
- Messages
- 51
- Reaction score
- 366
She still would have had to hit him for them to agree she was guilty of that.Because the DUI charge was connected to the manslaughter charge
She still would have had to hit him for them to agree she was guilty of that.Because the DUI charge was connected to the manslaughter charge
Just the small hole/damage that the out of town cop saw when her car was towed from her parents home, AFTER it had been at FAIRVIEW. THENNNN Proctor and co. got a hold of it. Again, NONE Of them had the thought that someone who knew what when on in the basement told, and KR was able to lawyer up and fight the 'story'.. Boy has it unfolded MUCH to the Alberts and McCabe's ..'distress'. Stay tunedBecause they could have been back there damaging the taillight. Nobody said there was zero damage at all points
The thing about it is that police can lie to suspects in America. They can say they found DNA, they can say it's on video, they can say they have a witness who told them everything... It's allowed and LE does that ALL the time.RSBM - This is the very first case I have personally watched closely that I found the CW (prosecutor) to be untrustworthy! I am extremely disappointed in the amount of times that the CW twisted, turned, and flat out tried to confuse the truth!! It started before the trial as well - with the comment that there was video proof that she hit him with her vehicle! I think they should be sanctioned over several things that they did in trial! You are right, I expect this kind of behavior from some shady defense attorneys that try anything and everything to get their client off. I have never expected it from the "legal" prosecutors!
A lot of this depends on if skin was broken upon impact of the MV or impact with anything else that could have caused his injuries. The thing about this is that there is always a "possibility" that something else happened that we can't account for either because of this bad investigation or because of "lack of imagination."Nothing of his DNA under the car or tailpipe, nothing of him. Factual entered evidence. Oh and the car did not hit John, nor just his head and propelled him up to the lawn with a deep gash only, and multiple skull fractures from that per evidence and also dog bites, his defensive arm, also face beaten, back of knuckles bruised. Old news, wait for the upcoming new news. Rehash.
Ok I need a link to where I’m supposed to find this, I listen to most of the defense testimony and it was just mostly on chain of custody stuff….its kind of boring to lol .No they were presented as pieces of the lexus tail light, not legit.
I agree 100%. The inverted video doesn't show any tampering or planting of evidence. In my opinion it's value as exculpatory evidence for the defense is nil.Agree it was kinda shady but it didn’t show proctor doing anything to the tail light.
I agree 100%. The inverted video doesn't show any tampering or planting of evidence. In my opinion it's value as exculpatory evidence for the defense is nil.
JMO.
Still don’t change the evidence of her tail light being around and on John. The lie made no difference he didn’t arrive back to the Sally Port until 5:30ish and the SERT search was going on.No, but he said noone went near the taillight and that was a flat out lie. You are right that we cannot see Proctor do anything to the taillight, but we also can't see that he didn't. Proctor also lied about the time that he picked up the car - on an affidavit! He lied! Not by a minute, but by an hour. Not one digit wrong, but the whole time wrong!! That is in NO way a typo! He even couldn't explain it.
If there was something nefarious about the video being inverted then I would have more of a problem with it.I wonder why they didn't just show it truthfully then. I don't disagree since we can't see what's going on over there, but they did this on purpose, which makes them look guilty <modsnip>.
IMO MOO
Still don’t change the evidence of her tail light being around and on John. The lie made no difference he didn’t arrive back to the Sally Port until 5:30ish and the SERT search was going on.
I don’t see it as a malicious lie, I’m sure he was writing his report as he was driving.
I agree 100%. The inverted video doesn't show any tampering or planting of evidence. In my opinion it's value as exculpatory evidence for the defense is nil.
JMO.
Okay. It still doesn't mean much to me because it doesn't show any tampering. Looking at the tail light is not tampering it. JMO.It showed perjury again by them claiming noone "went near the damaged taillight", but they did! You can't see what he is doing near the taillight, so how do you know he isn't tampering with it? He is bent down near it - even though they said noone went near it.
I see the defense doing the same thing, by trying to throw so many people under the bus. This is a question…..was the statement about having video evidence of Karen hitting John before the charges were upped? Asking because if I remember correctly didn’t her attorney come out and say this was an accident there was no intent involved?RSBM - This is the very first case I have personally watched closely that I found the CW (prosecutor) to be untrustworthy! I am extremely disappointed in the amount of times that the CW twisted, turned, and flat out tried to confuse the truth!! It started before the trial as well - with the comment that there was video proof that she hit him with her vehicle! I think they should be sanctioned over several things that they did in trial! You are right, I expect this kind of behavior from some shady defense attorneys that try anything and everything to get their client off. I have never expected it from the "legal" prosecutors!
Can you link that please?So Kevin Albert has been placed on paid administrative leave pending an outside, independent investigation for his actions in a case he investigated with Michael Protor from 2 yrs ago. The statement was just issued by the Canton Select Board Meeting tonight.
And blood in the snow. I wonder how much blood he had lost. And how long under those weather temps would it take a body to get down to 80 degrees.I still want to know how/why he has blood on his pants. The CW can't explain any portion of this case to my satisfaction. If he was hit and just "ended up" where he was with this major cut on his head, he wouldn't have had blood down on his pants. How did that occur? They can't and didn't try to explain that phenomenon.
Okay. It still doesn't mean much to me because it doesn't show any tampering. Looking at the tail light is not tampering it. JMO.