This makes it all the more interesting why she avoided Chloe that night. If she's a true "dog person" she'd at least try to greet Chloe, get in a few head scratches while Chloe passes by on her way to the back yard. I think Julie was afraid of Chloe.
MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #3
- Thread starter Bishop Black
- Start date
- Status
shotgun09
'Certified' Boomer
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Messages
- 4,317
- Reaction score
- 45,056
shotgun09
'Certified' Boomer
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Messages
- 4,317
- Reaction score
- 45,056
She did say it was a square table also, didn't she?
Because that was important.....
( I think I heard it described as square three times today )
Neither Sarah or Julie have mentioned what made them change their minds about staying later at the Albert's that night. Julie testified that she contacted her brother to come get them and then met him at his truck outside when he pulled up and said she was going to stay longer. I hope they ask her why she decided to change her mind and why she didn't notify her brother earlier - like when he was on the way to get her - that her plans changed.
LvsAMystry
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2003
- Messages
- 1,346
- Reaction score
- 5,325
Biggest outtake today: why did Jen McCabe ask Julie Nagel for screenshots of her conversation with her brother Ryan who came to pick her up around time KR dropping JOK off? Why did she need to see exactly what was said?
Elliot_Alderson
Well-Known Idiot
From today's witnesses I learned that it was snowing out. For absolute certain. Will it take another 11 days of testimony to confirm what amount of precipitation fell? Instead of asking each witness could CW just subpoena someone from NOAA?
LaineyJ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2021
- Messages
- 926
- Reaction score
- 12,364
I don’t understand what’s going on here, the prosecution is going to bore the jury, and that’s not good for them. It feels like most of what we’ve heard could’ve been covered in half the time. Anyone know how much longer they’re going to be presenting? They need to move on to more…important? topics to get this moving. I’m impatient to get to the defense’s turn.
Sarah Levinson is the one who said she knew her rights and didn’t choose to speak to the defense.
That is said by both prosecution and defense, it is the signal that the witness has finished looking at whatever it is.
Perhaps he should say “look up at the ceiling fan when you’re done?” Haha (since that’s where the camera goes when court goes on break.)
Also…if the witness is being truthful, they can’t be intimidated.
waldojabba
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2019
- Messages
- 1,937
- Reaction score
- 30,264
I think they all felt entitled to do whatever, including drive drunk/underage drinking at their houses etc.
Chris sending pictures of himself and his wife on JO's lawn while he is on vacation taunting him, ""See John - no fence is keeping us out" is another one. These people seeming have no respect for others, the law or "boundaries" - physical or otherwise.
They were Albert's or Friends of the Albert''s, and they all felt they had an invisible shield to protect them from consequences.
And maybe they did, for years. Seems it' s all coming full circle.
I was amazed at the attitude gushing from Nagle but actually had to kind of respect it. She was honest about being
intoxicated and kind of owned being a tough chick. Credit for that.
This really is a rough and tumble crowd.
And yet... that all may be so interestlingly suspicious... BUT still no evidence that Karen ran over and killed her boyfriend John O'Keefe.
Its still Crickets on that front -
JMO
The prosecution could clear up any sense of evasiveness on re-direct. Or they could have asked the questions on direct so the defense didn’t have any chance to create a sense of evasiveness. Why isn’t the prosecution doing this is my question.
He wasn’t trying to make the point that she is close to the family. He was (correctly) making the point that she lied 60 seconds before when she said she didn’t think she’d ever been in their house, when clearly she has.
Chelly
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 18,805
- Reaction score
- 66,929
All the family/friends' testimony sounds Hinky to me, especially Brian Albert Sr. However, difficult to believe O'Keefe was actually in that house and every witness (12 or more?) has colluded in their lies to deny he was there. Can you imagine all the conspiracy meetings they would have had to prep for court.
Super Mario made me laugh
shotgun09
'Certified' Boomer
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Messages
- 4,317
- Reaction score
- 45,056
Why yes! Yes I can! At those same meetings, I can be sure that the subject of 'You didn't actually see exactly when and how, in what vehicle with whom and through which door Colin Albert left, did you?' came up also. Funny that
The judge is more likely to allow witnesses than the photos at this point, because she wants verification of the time and date the photo was taken. It can be manipulated too easily and the source is social media for the baby shower photo, so that’s why she wouldn’t allow that one.
HawthorneJuniper
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2021
- Messages
- 243
- Reaction score
- 2,835
Probably because cross is limited to the substance of direct because it is the Prosecution's case in chief. The Defense can also call her during their case. That's when all of that will be explored. The Judge has been strictly limiting the defense's questioning of witnesses, as you may have noticed.
And even during the defense's case presentation I assume the Judge will continue to limit questioning probably based on prior decisions about the defense's ability to present SOGDI.
- Status