Maat99
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2011
- Messages
- 242
- Reaction score
- 2,747
Why would they? What he said exactly agrees with what the defense has been saying all along. “Cracked with one piece missing” is not even remotely close to shattered. So now that whole yarn about minute particles of taillight embedded in the shirt also seems ridiculously implausible IMO.I wonder why the defense didn't ask Ofc Barros to tell the jury exactly what the damage to the tail light was?