Tekno
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2020
- Messages
- 418
- Reaction score
- 1,467
I agree but Mr Wolters wasn’t just evasive, he was also agitated by the question. Why?Which means very little, IMO.
Clarke asked, HCW evaded. As usual.
I agree but Mr Wolters wasn’t just evasive, he was also agitated by the question. Why?Which means very little, IMO.
Clarke asked, HCW evaded. As usual.
Which means very little, IMO.
Clarke asked, HCW evaded. As usual.
In my opinion, the person who called CB at 19h32 on the night of Madeleine’s disappearance, may well have been identified. In his book, Clarke asked Mr Wolters if friend Chris Post, accompanied CB on the night of 3 May.
Madeleine McCann suspect Christian B could be charged by Christmas thanks to 'strong new evidence'
German prosecutor Hans Christian Walters told The Sun: “We have strong new evidence against the suspect.
An insider on the German investigation said: “The evidence is strong and puts him in the area where Madeleine vanished.
I’m new to this so hopefully I’ve replied & sourced in the correct way. Initially they had his phone in the area (quite likely he was using it’
Now they’ve got ‘him in the area’
Purely conjecture but I think they may a photo or video showing him in the area that afternoon
I agree but Mr Wolters wasn’t just evasive, he was also agitated by the question. Why?
Or they have, indeed, found the person who called CB.
Or they have, indeed, found the person who called CB.
(...)They’re investigating for at least 6 crimes so I do think they’ll aim to arrest him for more than 1 crime at a time
For me the "new evidence" is exactly the same they did already had here : - Police probing Madeleine McCann case 'have dramatic new evidence against Christian Brueckner' | Daily Mail Online . I don't think they did get anything new apart from what they did already have at 05/2021. New evidence don't fall from the sky everyday on investigation of cold cases like this where the suspect is already in jail and can't do much to change what already happened.
The SUN article is a direct reply to the MM parents article that is a direct response to JC promoting the book. Because JC was on the media, MM parents talked about it and in return forced HCW/BKA to reply, or better, they might be requested by media for a reply, if the reply wasn't made up by itself.
That thing about the SY Now believing the evidence and the (not named) british police suggesting that now UK LEA believe BKA/CB killed MM does look to me the sort of cheap advertizment one is expected to encounter for example on software that have 5 star seals of many IT magazines to "show" the stuff is really good, or something one should expect to see on products like loose height pills when someone on the advertizement says that he/she didn't believe on the article/product advertized but then tried it out and it does really work. In my oppinion I don't think that on a missing children case/or any other investigation case for that matter - an investigator of a police force like BKA do have the "need" to get someone from another police force (that is not even named theone who made the comment) to say that they didn't believe at first but now they are sure that the evidence is good/strong, etc ... For me is ... to say the least.
Also to end I think a little bit like FF, this is a criminal investigation so let them show the evidence in court. I don't need for someone on another police force to say that the evidence is good or not, i need the evidence to be shown in court and see that evidenced used in trial to get CB on jail for the crime. Let them show the evidence (and i don't believe that they will do that soon).
My oppinion is that at Christmas they will delay once again saying something like there was some un-expected problem and they need more time, like they will delay to march/april or most likely may.
Even if this ends up in trial, meaning, even if HCW/BKA do charge CB there is still another important thing to consider, we still have to see if evidence will support HCW claims in trial.
People/some posters might be over-reacting over this because :
1)There is no guarantee that this recent info is "new" as most likely it is not and it was just a reaction to JC promotion of the book.
2)There is no certain that they will charge this year.
3)Even if they charge there is no guarantee that the evidence will prove without doubt in trial/court that CB did the crime.
For me the "new evidence" is exactly the same they did already had here : - Police probing Madeleine McCann case 'have dramatic new evidence against Christian Brueckner' | Daily Mail Online . I don't think they did get anything new apart from what they did already have at 05/2021. New evidence don't fall from the sky everyday on investigation of cold cases like this where the suspect is already in jail and can't do much to change what already happened.
The SUN article is a direct reply to the MM parents article that is a direct response to JC promoting the book. Because JC was on the media, MM parents talked about it and in return forced HCW/BKA to reply, or better, they might be requested by media for a reply, if the reply wasn't made up by itself.
That thing about the SY Now believing the evidence and the (not named) british police suggesting that now UK LEA believe BKA/CB killed MM does look to me the sort of cheap advertizment one is expected to encounter for example on software that have 5 star seals of many IT magazines to "show" the stuff is really good, or something one should expect to see on products like loose height pills when someone on the advertizement says that he/she didn't believe on the article/product advertized but then tried it out and it does really work. In my oppinion I don't think that on a missing children case/or any other investigation case for that matter - an investigator of a police force like BKA do have the "need" to get someone from another police force (that is not even named theone who made the comment) to say that they didn't believe at first but now they are sure that the evidence is good/strong, etc ... For me is ... to say the least.
Also to end I think a little bit like FF, this is a criminal investigation so let them show the evidence in court. I don't need for someone on another police force to say that the evidence is good or not, i need the evidence to be shown in court and see that evidenced used in trial to get CB on jail for the crime. Let them show the evidence (and i don't believe that they will do that soon).
My oppinion is that at Christmas they will delay once again saying something like there was some un-expected problem and they need more time, like they will delay to march/april or most likely may.
Even if this ends up in trial, meaning, even if HCW/BKA do charge CB there is still another important thing to consider, we still have to see if evidence will support HCW claims in trial.
People/some posters might be over-reacting over this because :
1)There is no guarantee that this recent info is "new" as most likely it is not and it was just a reaction to JC promotion of the book.
2)There is no certain that they will charge this year.
3)Even if they charge there is no guarantee that the evidence will prove without doubt in trial/court that CB did the crime.
BKA/HCW only have jurisdiction over MM case, Irish woman rape, incident on playground and 10 years old girl assault. For CB to be charged over "other crimes" (mentioned on recent book promotion on the media) it would require for the prosecutors or LEA forces with jurisdiction for those same cases to press charge, thing that is out of equation. Don't believe in all that you read on the context of some book promotions please ... Try to stick to HCW "real" press conference/declarations to the press/documentary.
In July 2021 HCW said that they had received more than 1000 tips and it would take time to work through them.
Do you not think that's it's possible that something else may have been discovered?
A small nugget, another piece of the jigsaw?
Another tidbit to help HCW to join the dots?
JC will explain...........
I think a big nugget! Something more significant than phone records & something that not only puts his phone at the scene of the crime, but also puts him at the scene of crime
EXCLUSIVE: Over 1,000 new tips on Madeleine McCann case which could be solved 'by end of the year' - Olive Press News Spain
I’ll double check how many Braunschweig are investigating, I thought it to be 6. Judging by the amount of information they have, it could be much more.
Do you not think that's it's possible that something else may have been discovered?
JC will explain...........
Madeleine McCann suspect Christian B could be charged by Christmas thanks to 'strong new evidence'
German prosecutor Hans Christian Walters told The Sun: “We have strong new evidence against the suspect.
An insider on the German investigation said: “The evidence is strong and puts him in the area where Madeleine vanished.
I’m new to this so hopefully I’ve replied & sourced in the correct way. Initially they had his phone in the area (quite likely he was using it’
Now they’ve got ‘him in the area’
Purely conjecture but I think they may a photo or video showing him in the area that afternoon
“We have strong new evidence against the suspect. The investigation is proceeding well and we hope to have an update soon. I cannot say when for certain but we are working very hard to solve this case and others where he is a suspect.”
In July 2021 HCW said that they had received more than 1000 tips and it would take time to work through them.
Do you not think that's it's possible that something else may have been discovered?