Madeleine McCann: German Prisoner Identified as Suspect, #41

[mrjitty]

I can't get over how bizarre and unconstitutional it is for this official speculation about a trial in respect of someone not even charged.

No one cares about the constitutionality because CB is a dirtbag - but imagine the state did this in respect of a politician or activists etc?

Oh maybe we will try you next year but yeah maybe we don't have evidence?

Insane IMO

 

[ChatteringBirds]

no body case is going to be super difficult without forensics IMO.

True, although there have been murder convictions in Germany without a victim being located.

I can't get over how bizarre and unconstitutional it is for this official speculation about a trial in respect of someone not even charged.

It is bizarre, and I bet some are silently regretting they ever said what they said.


<modsnip: Quoted post was removed>

 

[Sillybilly]

ADMIN NOTE:

Some posts have been removed due to no link in the original post.

 

[tedtink]

For those who missed it.
"The Sun Exclusive"...Interview with HCW on The Sun official YT channel.

 

[tedtink]

Here's the interview with Jutta Rabe on The Sun official YT channel.

 

[Anxala]

I can't get over how bizarre and unconstitutional it is for this official speculation about a trial in respect of someone not even charged.

No one cares about the constitutionality because CB is a dirtbag - but imagine the state did this in respect of a politician or activists etc?

Oh maybe we will try you next year but yeah maybe we don't have evidence?

Insane IMO

Bizarre and unconstitutional and extraordinary, I agree.

And yet it continues. No let up. No willingness to back off. Full steam ahead.

 

[mrjitty]

True, although there have been murder convictions in Germany without a victim being located.

Agreed - but its a heavy lift to have no forensics in an old historical case - so then you really need some digital evidence or something else physical? And so the challenges pile up ....

It is bizarre, and I bet some are silently regretting they ever said what they said.



<modsnip: Quoted post was removed>

I said that from the outset - seemed very foolish to wade right out into the middle of this case if they weren't ready to charge.

One speculation I have is maybe something went wrong with evidence they thought they had.

 

[mrjitty]

Bizarre and unconstitutional and extraordinary, I agree.

And yet it continues. No let up. No willingness to back off. Full steam ahead.

Good to see the Judge was unhappy about it. They poisoned their own trial.

 

[Anxala]

Agreed - but its a heavy lift to have no forensics in an old historical case - so then you really need some digital evidence or something else physical? And so the challenges pile up ....

I said that from the outset - seemed very foolish to wade right out into the middle of this case if they weren't ready to charge.

One speculation I have is maybe something went wrong with evidence they thought they had.

As in, a crucial witness bailed and/or proved, over time, to be unreliable?
As in, the disovery that evidence they had had not come about via legal means and could therefore not be used in a trial?

Just speculating.