Took the survey.
I did have a few quibbles about how the thing was presented.
The following is a comment I made in the survey about the 'information left out of the documentary':
"I have looked at some of this 'information left out' previously, and some of it is false, some is misleading, and some is irrelevant.
For example, what someone does to a cat in 1982 is not 'evidence' of a crime supposedly committed in 2005 which does not involve any cats.
Or whether someone has a 'perfect' relationship with their live in girlfriend is not evidence of involvement of a murder of a business acquaintance.
There is no evidence Teresa ever asked her employers that she not be asked to return to Avery Salvage Yard.
Some of this 'information' comes from the prosecutor, Ken Kratz, whose honesty is questionable."