(Bolding mine.)Yes, but doctors also save lives, and are mighty handy during an emergency; and a suspected spinal cord injury needs immediate treatment.
Sorry Martha, I know you are being serious, but that made me giggle :crazy:
(Bolding mine.)Yes, but doctors also save lives, and are mighty handy during an emergency; and a suspected spinal cord injury needs immediate treatment.
(Bolding mine.)
Sorry Martha, I know you are being serious, but that made me giggle :crazy:
oops; yes I guess he didn't want the "white glove treatment".
oops; yes I guess he didn't want the "white glove treatment".
Ha ha ha!
Their defense will be the doctors know best, and did it for his own good.
Doctors used to give women thalidimide for their own good. They used to automatically give them hysterectomies at menopause for their own good. They still deliver an alarming amount of babies by C-section--up to 40% at some hospitals--for their own good.
I'm for letting the medical staff do what they need to do, but I have refused once (think most to all of you would have done the same). I think it's important to respect the wishes of the patient above all else. If they refuse, don't do it!
As for suing, he probably felt violated or even raped and could suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. PTSD can result from any type of traumatic experience, not just war. Who knows if he's telling the truth, but it is possible.
Well, he was asleep when they did the procedure, so I doubt he felt too violated; .
Tell that to the victims of GHB rape.
He was begging and being held down, before being knocked out. Isn't that alone traumatic? Plus, being asleep wouldn't be enough to make me accept something I flat out didn't want done to me.
Rape isn't truly sexual, it's about power/control and I can see how (in his mind) he could consider it rape. Especially, if he was ever abused in that way.
I think he should have went along with it (it was obviously important), but I think it's wrong to force the issue.
Well notice I consider it a procedure, not rape. It was in a medical setting; hardly a diabolical sexual assault. NObody gained pleasure from looking up his *advertiser censored**s, the purpose was for a medical diagnosis, plain and simple. { The legal violation would be doing the procedure against his will, or permission.}
Of course it's wrong to sedate a woman, or man, and rape them.
As far as someone who had had past "trauma", that would certainly be considered by the jury.
But he "can't work" because he got hit on the head by a beam so he went to the ER and he said he didn't want a rectal, he punched the doc, they sedated him; did a rectal, he went home healthy except for this "trauma", and NOW HE CAN"T WORK.
:boohoo: :boohoo: Some women have a difficult delivery, episiotomy, have to care for a baby, and they manage to go back to work within a week.
Why was he on a stretcher anyway, if he could walk on his own?
If this guy gets a million dollars for his PST, then every man or woman coming back from Iraq or Afghanistan should get a million to live on and "not work".
It's all relative. this guy wants $$$$$ and so do his attorneys.
On the other hand, I know for a fact that many, many people try to claim they can't work when they can.
I am good friends with a Dr. who examines people for Workman's Compensation, and you wouldn't believe the funny stories he tells. They say they can't "move their right leg". So he examines the right leg. Then goes on to examine other things - then he says something to them, like "here - scoot over and sit on the edge of the table". WALLAH! When they're not thinking about it they MOVE THE RIGHT LEG!!!
Half to 2/3 of the people don't qualify for the Workman's Comp.
I have no doubt this man may be pissed that his wishes weren't obeyed; and he may have some grounds for compensation there.
But the "can't work" is a red flag for me; I think he should be glad he wasn't seriously injured at the workplace. Of course he'll probably apply for Workman's Comp. as well.
He was begging and being held down, before being knocked out. Isn't that alone traumatic? Plus, being asleep wouldn't be enough to make me accept something I flat out didn't want done to me.
Rape isn't truly sexual, it's about power/control and I can see how (in his mind) he could consider it rape. Especially, if he was ever abused in that way.
I think he should have went along with it (it was obviously important), but I think it's wrong to force the issue.
I have seen Worker's Comp people on TV busted...yeah they are disgusting no doubt...but something in this mans story makes me believe him.
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one!
IMO Whoever penetrated him should be facing criminal charges for rape!