SugarQueen
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2009
- Messages
- 4,967
- Reaction score
- 16,038
Federal law, state law, county, then city law BUT city law can be more restrictive and in that way " trump" state law. Hope that makes sense.
IF they were just treated as 'suspects' in a death that would be fine. But they have already been charged with the crime, and without sufficient cause, imo. So that is the problem that I have with it.
I am sorry that you and your family had to deal with a couple of psychos that terrorized you. That is awful. But I do believe that is a very rare occurrence. Especially in modern times.
As for Rice, we do not know all of the details. There must have been some extenuating circumstances or mitigating evidence which gave some balance.
The SA did not charge Rice with murder. So I do not see how his troubles with his temper and ex wife have anything to do with this case.
Federal law, state law, county, then city law BUT city law can be more restrictive and in that way " trump" state law. Hope that makes sense.
He was in close proximity to the victim, specifically to his upper back and neck, and has a long history of violent anger problems. So whatever he's been arrested for, that's a good enough reason for me to be concerned about his potential role in this.
Re "very rare occurrence" - no, it isn't. It certainly isn't in Baltimore, more to the point.
And why "must there" be extenuating circumstances, for a drunk with a gun threatening people for hours in front of police, for them to let him walk away? Do you really think there's no such thing as cronyism, cops protecting cops from consequences? Why must a woman who is threatened with harm in her own home by an armed man have to have contributed to his rage in people's minds?
If he was just another case posted on this forum, and not a cop, I wonder how many would assume "extenuating circumstances" for him terrorising that family as he did. Imagine any other man doing all that, having an armed stand off with cops, and the cops let him literally walk away.
Cops are supposed to be above that sort of thing, so I can see why people might give them the benefit. But reality is, not all of them are above it.
Bringing it back to Gray - there's a witness who heard Gray yelling for the cops to get off his back, and that he was in pain. The cop kneeling in direct proximity to Gray's neck is Officer DV up there. A news report has video close-ups which show Gray's legs being released from over his back -- where another witness said they were, folded up against his back "like a pretzel".
And in this particular case, I am not very inclined to automatically assume all of the witnesses are lying just because police are being accused.
Cops are supposed to be above that sort of thing, so I can see why people might give them the benefit. But reality is, not all of them are above it.
There were no outward signs of injury on FG. Seems like there would be if his neck got stomped on.
Not to mention that we saw the video of him and his legs were not folded up against his back--he was in a leg lace.
Anyways, none of this matters because the SA said what happened to cause his death happened in the van
I do feel whatever the injury, it was exacerbated in the van. I don't think it happened in the van. I think the prosecution is mistaken in that regard but that's JMO.
And if there's any doubt about there about there being an atmosphere of dense cronyism, lies and cover-up mentality in BPD.. here's Joe Crystal again, on his own experiences as an honest cop there, very worth watching:
.