thefragile7393
Verified - Registered Psychiatric Nurse
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2007
- Messages
- 4,525
- Reaction score
- 3,036
The problem is when the focus starts being on this person constantly and the focus starts being on him more and more. People start trying to dissect everything said and trying to figure out if he’s involved-when there’s no reason to focus heavily on him or read more into what he’s said or done more than necessary. IMO he’s a red herring, and nothing more. So what if he’s “smack dab” in the middle of it? There’s so many reasons why he could have done that-and not all of them are evil.To date, the "tracker" has certainly been an interesting piece of the puzzle. Why he chose to place himself smack dab in the middle of things remains very curious to me. Could be something, could be nothing. Since all his narrative has been all over MSM I see no reason not to be aware and shine a light on it. As far as I know . granted from his account to MSM, it was his step daughter who found the body in the drain, at his direction, in about an hour after arriving at the park. To me that is a pretty significant event.
Talking about one thing does not preclude other discussion on other case aspects imo
ALL JMO
His narrative may be helpful (or not so much) but overly focusing on him like he’s a POI and trying to turn him into something he may not be distracts from the known facts. There’s a difference between discussing his words and going down the rabbit hole to try and go overly deep into his words and actions to the point where it’s almost insinuating he had something to do with this. And yes, IMO it seems to be happening in quite a few posts-which is why I say it.
Last edited: