georgiajean
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2010
- Messages
- 2,443
- Reaction score
- 3,131
Okay, one more. This one actually has the most information about what happened in court today.
http://www.hometownlife.com/article/20101221/NEWS24/101221005
Prosecution called for a delay in the hearing due to evidence not coming in. The phone records and the DNA evidence. Judge ruled that prosecution had filed for the evidence in a timely manner, and it was not the prosecution's fault.
The hearing for all three defendants was adjourned until 1:30 p.m. Thursday, Jan. 13.
Defense feels the delay is not fair, and that the suspects should be free while waiting, not in jail.
But, NC is a 4th time offender, so he's sitting tight, and JY, because he confessed, is also sitting tight. Held without bond until hearing in January.
Judge refused to reduce TL (NC's mother)'s 300,000 bond, saying that she had attempted to intimidate a witness, and it was 4 months after CM's disappearance. So she needed to sit tight as well, because the court would not tolerate such things. Defense argued she was in danger of losing her job that she'd had for 15 years. Judge said tough (I am paraphrasing, of course).
http://www.hometownlife.com/article/20101221/NEWS24/101221005
Prosecution called for a delay in the hearing due to evidence not coming in. The phone records and the DNA evidence. Judge ruled that prosecution had filed for the evidence in a timely manner, and it was not the prosecution's fault.
The hearing for all three defendants was adjourned until 1:30 p.m. Thursday, Jan. 13.
Defense feels the delay is not fair, and that the suspects should be free while waiting, not in jail.
But, NC is a 4th time offender, so he's sitting tight, and JY, because he confessed, is also sitting tight. Held without bond until hearing in January.
Judge refused to reduce TL (NC's mother)'s 300,000 bond, saying that she had attempted to intimidate a witness, and it was 4 months after CM's disappearance. So she needed to sit tight as well, because the court would not tolerate such things. Defense argued she was in danger of losing her job that she'd had for 15 years. Judge said tough (I am paraphrasing, of course).