Who exactly were the members of this household?
The mom’s two daughters are old enough to live on their own. There is nothing mentioned about the dad having any kids from a previous marriage.
Who exactly were the members of this household?
9-year-old accused of murder grew more aggressive before mom's killing, family saysThe 9-year-old boy was a handful.
When he wasn’t walking through neighbors’ yards with a flashlight, he was pointing his beloved BB gun at their children, said residents. One time, he fired the weapon at three children but didn’t strike them.
![]()
Pauline Randol (Photo: Facebook)
His behavior grew more aggressive the past few weeks, prompting his adoptive mother to schedule an appointment at a mental health clinic, said relatives.
Last Monday, one day before the appointment, authorities say the boy grabbed one of his father’s hunting rifles, pointed it at his mom and pulled the trigger. Pauline Randol, 51, was killed.
The youth was charged last week with murder, according to court records. Authorities haven't released details about the killing.
Randol had told a doctor she was worried where her son’s behavior was headed, said family members.
“She was so scared she was raising the next serial killer," said Harley Martin, 27, one of Randol's biological daughters.
This whole family lives in a weird state of denial or oblivion. No one can help anyone if they’re not realistic about the issues that need to be addressed.There are two older sisters talking to the press.
Daughter of woman 'shot dead by her nine-year-old adoptive son' says he was only trying to SCARE her | Daily Mail Online
Reagan Martin, 23, believes the boy - who has not been identified because he is underage - was likely attempting to frighten her biological mother, Pauline Randol, when he fatally injured her with a rifle in their living room on Monday morning.
'I don’t think he meant to do it. I think was probably a scare tactic,' she told MLive.
In court Tuesday, the boy asked where his mother was and Harley Martin said 'he doesn't know what he did'.
'He doesn't understand why he can't come home or anything,' she continued. 'He's traumatized by what he saw in there. That's all he told my dad about was seeing that. It's going to mess him up for a really long time because he does not realize what he's done.'
The boy was charged Wednesday with the woman's murder but his sisters, who are Randol's children from a previous relationship, have said he suffers from mental health issues.
Two little 9 year olds - killers?? I just can’t comprehend this9-year-old charged with murder in Illinois fire that killed 5
Found an update on this case in an article about another 9 year old.
Last month, a Michigan judge dismissed a murder charge against a 9-year-old accused of fatally shooting his mother in their home near Sturgis. St. Joseph County Family Division Judge David Tomlinson ruled that, under Michigan law, the boy was presumed incompetent for trial because he’s not yet 10.
Same here. I'm biting my tongue, too. Don't get me started. (I just deleted a line I entered here.)Why can’t the US figure out some gun control? All weapons (if you must have them) should be locked with no access to the keys for the children. Is this not basic common sense? Given the child had serious mental health issues, make alternate arrangements for the guns in your house, given them to a fellow hunter if you need to.
I am so tired of hearing about all this gun violence in the US with children.
I could say a lot more, but I’ll bite my tongue.
In this country, virtually every path to help is strewn with obstacles and all of our systems are broken, gun control is non-existent, and the things that really matter are instead only topics for dispute and igniting a reaction from "the other side". No one has any intention of fixing any system because it's a means of control on so many levels. Strife and scandal are necessary tools needed to maintain confusion and animosity in the world.
There is an uncomfortably high number of foster/adoptive parents who sign an intent to adopt as soon as a child is placed with them, and push the system to make that happen as quickly as possible. Sometimes the motivator is the adoption subsidy money, sometimes it's a desire to be seen as accepting of any child so the district will continue to place kids with them, sometimes it's the genuine belief that love and a family can make everything better -- the problem is, once that "honeymoon period" is over, that adoptive parent is left with a still-broken child and they have now detached themselves from the system that could better assist in accessing the services the child needs. The goal of achieving permanency for a child through adoption is a noble one, but meaningless if both the child and the family aren't afforded the chance to reach that stage where the illusion slips away and those issues and behaviors come out. One of the Federal govt's measures of success is how quickly permanency is achieved, whether through reunification with a parent, discharge to a relative, or adoption, and there is no advantage to keeping a child in care so those time-bomb issues can be uncovered and treated.
I do feel terrible for the family's loss, and am sad that the child will enter yet another system that will fail him.
Wouldn't hurt...I can't tell if I'm being sarcastic or not. . . but is it time to add a "please keep firearms out of reach of patient" warning on prescription bottles? IMO MOO