Whole and CS:
Well, there is another reason why I am hesitant to do that. If you look at the Google Image of the bound boy, it is attributed to “piratenews.org,” which I never heard of previously. I have now, unfortunately.
It appears to be an ultra-right wing conspiracy site with strongly anti-Semitic overtones. It is replete with the usual "new world order" conspiracy theories, and there is presently a disgusting “report” on it concerning rabbis allegedly committing obscene crimes while practicing circumcisions. It almost seems likes Der Stürmer reincarnated. (That was a Nazi-era “newspaper” published by Julius Streicher, one of Hitler’s early political cronies. Streicher was the most rabid anti-Semite in the Nazi movement and his newspaper was virtually pornographic, which included virulent attacks on Jewish people. He was hanged at Nuremberg after the war along with many top Nazis.)
As I said in my original post, I’m uncertain why this image comes up under Noreen Gosch’s name. I can only guess that it was once on her website, and she later took it down for some reason. If it had been on her website at one time, I have no idea where she would have gotten it from. Maybe someone mailed it to her anonymously and when she discovered the original internet source for the photo took it down in horror.
If this photo originated (at least online) with piratenews.org, I have no idea in what context. It might have been used in some “report” about “Jews abducting blond-haired ‘Aryan’ kids like this one for nefarious purposes,” and the entire photo might be a setup for that purpose and the boy is not Steven Kraft.
On the other hand, if this photo did once appear online at piratenews.org, maybe they got if from some other website (not their own) devoted to another agenda and it might be Steven. It’s just all so uncertain. But I’d have to believe that authorities would routinely monitor sites like piratenews.org and would already be aware of the photograph if it originally appeared there. They refer to the FBI as “Nazis,” which might be considered the height of irony.