These are clips regarding Stacy’s swimsuit and Suzie’s overnight bag.I trust you. Not going to pay for subscription to read.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
These are clips regarding Stacy’s swimsuit and Suzie’s overnight bag.I trust you. Not going to pay for subscription to read.
So we can assume Stacy was traveling light, so to speak. But then it doesn't seem like Stacy's swimsuit would fit in her purse (one piece, two piece, thong bikini - they were a thing back then).These are clips regarding Stacy’s swimsuit and Suzie’s overnight bag.
Many thanks to Bartt for that link. I just listened to one of the broadcasts and one thing I am unclear about is whether Suzie was going to testify. I have argued that her statement would have had to be “authenticated.” That would have been done if she had directly testified.
In the only time I have ever been called to testify it was for that reason. As it turned out, I didn’t know who had prepared a certain document and so testified. The judge immediately ruled it out as my testimony was “hearsay.” I had not prepared it nor did not know who had prepared it. I was then dismissed.
This may be insignificant but offhand does anyone here know?
On one other matter, and it could be important, is whether Joseph Riedel was in town that night. I have seen newspaper accounts that he was but that same newspaper published that Sherrill presented herself at the APCO station at or near 2 AM that night. I believe that was later “debunked” as a lady came forward to identify herself as the customer who may or may not have been at the station that night.
These “niggling” points may be insignificant but crimes have been committed for lesser reasons or none at all.
Would anyone be so kind to set me straight on these matters, especially the matter of Joseph Riedel. Was he in town that night or in Illinois? TIA.
I think people told Janis a lot of things so she wouldn’t ask a lot of questions.I think Janis was told by Janelle that Suzie was upset at Commencement and wanted to go home. IMO
Suzie wasn’t needed , and it would be hearsay , she wasn’t a fact witness .
If JR turned on the other boys What is his motive to abduct & murder 3 women ?
As I understand , JR didn’t even have transportation . I guess he could steal a car to drive BACK to Springfield , and risk it for what ?
ID does have some decent shows . Deadly recall , see no evil . It nightlights how this case in ‘92 has no technology to assist in the investigation , Phone records, traffic surveillance cameras, cell phone gps, toll tags ect .We got Netflix and binge watched Person Of Interest and The Blacklist.
I'm on the fence about docu-dramas as they tend to be more drama than documentary, like People's show of the Springfield Three. I just want facts and in-depth interviews of the people involved.
I read that the dog got out twice that night. First at around 10PM. Got into the neighbors yard and they put it back out over the fence. The second time was at 3AM; it came back and woke them up barking.Not much has been said of this but one tiny detail should be considered somehow in my opinion.
The Yorkie that Sherrill had would almost certainly have gone berserk at that hour of night. I have had one myself and they are incredibly loud and unwilling to entertain strangers even in the daytime. In fact, although she was otherwise a good healthy dog we surrendered her back to the adoption agency. It seems likely to me that whoever was able to have gained entry it must have been someone known to the family.
The number of such people had to be exceedingly small.
Why would any of the women have allowed anyone in there unless he was familiar to the dog?
Thoughts?
I read that the dog got out twice that night. First at around 10PM. Got into the neighbors yard and they put it back out over the fence. The second time was at 3AM; it came back and woke them up barking.
2) Was it confirmed that Sherill's floral dress was missing?
Never heard anything about a missing floral dress. Where did you read that?
Not much has been said of this but one tiny detail should be considered somehow in my opinion.
The Yorkie that Sherrill had would almost certainly have gone berserk at that hour of night. I have had one myself and they are incredibly loud and unwilling to entertain strangers even in the daytime. In fact, although she was otherwise a good healthy dog we surrendered her back to the adoption agency. It seems likely to me that whoever was able to have gained entry it must have been someone known to the family.
The number of such people had to be exceedingly small.
Why would any of the women have allowed anyone in there unless he was familiar to the dog?
Thoughts?
I didn’t recall the 10:00 time. Thank you. I thought it was 1:30. Trying to understand why anyone who the dog was not familiar would be let in. My first impression would be to tell a stranger to leave immediately.
Who shows up at anyone’s house at 3 AM? A cop or someone well known to the resident but no one else. Besides, it would have been possible to have talked through the storm door without unlocking it.
I am fairly certain Sherrill was reported to be very concerned about security. I was told by an officer on the case that Suzie did not have a side door key to the carport because of Sherrill’s concerns. So far as I know entry was through the front door.