Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is important that we only view what Misty said; and not what we think we heard. Nor should we interpret what Misty said. Statement Analysis says:
....................................
I kept reading the article waiting for him to address the very first thing Misty said.
I didn't make it to the bathroom.
If you read that and take it at face value Misty had an accident in her pants.
If this can be applied as a general tool, then one needs to examine why AS uses the word "we". Why does she not talk about events leading up to arriving at the trailer? Who called her? Why did that person want her to go to the MH? Who was there?
IMO, GGM's "it's a crock" interview is deserving of as much scrutiny as is Misty's first interview.
I'm sure he would analyze the any interviews or statements that you were interested in. He seems open to suggestions.
It is important that we only view what Misty said; and not what we think we heard. Nor should we interpret what Misty said. Statement Analysis says:
....................................
I kept reading the article waiting for him to address the very first thing Misty said.
I didn't make it to the bathroom.
If you read that and take it at face value Misty had an accident in her pants.
Some of the things he said, I have no argument with. However, some of things he chalked up to deception I originally chalked up to lack of education, and still do. Misty's English skills are poor, at best, and jumping from the present to past tense is a sign of that.
This is very interesting. Thanks for posting it. Whenever anyone talks about what didn't happen I call that sideroading and it's obvious they don't want to talk about the issue at hand. The whole crime scene and 911 call reeked of rehearsed deception to my mind. Unbelievable anyone could behave this way with an innocent child at stake.
Some of the things he said, I have no argument with. However, some of things he chalked up to deception I originally chalked up to lack of education, and still do. Misty's English skills are poor, at best, and jumping from the present to past tense is a sign of that.
That was the first part of her interview. It gets better.
1. The blanket was in the van they took.
2. If I was awake, I wouldn't have left them take her.
3. What would they want with a five year old little girl?
4. If they took me, I could have fought them.
According to Statement Analyses..It would appear like we are not looking at single person taking Haleigh.
Thank you for the article. I learned so much about deception and lying!
Some of the things he said, I have no argument with. However, some of things he chalked up to deception I originally chalked up to lack of education, and still do. Misty's English skills are poor, at best, and jumping from the present to past tense is a sign of that.