sleutherontheside
Retired WS Staff
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2009
- Messages
- 9,874
- Reaction score
- 1
I suppose they could show control or domination by another person (CA), but overall, I think any plan to use G and C as mitigating factors is not going to go very far. Despite it all, despite her gum chewing and yammering and obvious lack of superior intellect, there really isn't a paper trail or concrete proof that I know of that shows them to be emotionally or physically abusive to Casey (other than the throtteling, which in my mind, I can't say I wouldn't be tempted to do the same if my kid stole from my elder parents). But all we really have about abuse is a lot of he said / she said speculation (of course, it might very well be true that C is a push-around, helicopter mom) but who's gonna come forward and say she was a terrible influence on Casey to the point she'd kill her own child? All the state would have to do to knock that out of the water is hold up a picture of Caylee's room, show the website that she wrote about her being missing, and point to the memorial video that she put together (which, lets not forget, she was generous enough to share with the public, the very same public that's been beating her like a dog since the very beginning of all this. If I were her, I'd have told everyone to go blow, and I'd have had a closed door private ceremony). I don't think it's gonna fly. She may not be a brilliant shining star of a mother, she may have her faults (and although we are quite sure her faults were damaging to Casey) there's simply no real proof of the kind of abuse or neglect that would drive someone to murder their own child. The fact that to this day, she's still sitting behind her daughter in court every time she's brought in, shows something. There are a lot worse parents out there than G and C. JMO.
I don't think that the penalty phase of this trial will focus on any one factor as their mitigation argument. The penalty phase will be spent trying to "humanize" KC, paint her as someone that got to this place via a number of circumstances that may or may not have been in her control. Part of mitigation is to paint a story that shows the defendant as human and worthy of living. Her parents could factor intot his phase in several ways.....not all bad. Part of mitigation is to show the good in someone, to show that they were not all bad, that they are someones daughter, sister, friend.....AL can use her parents to paint a picture of KC as loving while also exposing the dysfunction within the family unit. The social workers and investigators are working to unearth any usable info for this phase. SO while it may seem that using the family in mitigation is only a negative, it can also be used as a positive. Case in point.......a daughter accused of a heinous crime, the murder of her daughter, the grandchild of these two parties........is still being shown outward support against all odds and evidence. There shows evidence that even these grieving grandparents value their daughter's life. It could be quite compelling to some jurors, as well as nauseating to others. JMO