I apologize ahead of time if I ruffle any feathers with my style of writing! Sometimes I’m not very diplomatic and it could very well be seen as being sarcastic or facetious or think I’m better than anyone else or making fun of posts or bragging! Occasionally all of the above..
Though I do adore humorous sarcasm, I am VERY particular when and where I use it and will ONLY employ it when it’s at the SOLE expense of others! So ya know, I’ve got that going for me
Some people will even go as far as to call me long winded!!! ABSURD NOTION!!!. But I’ll come back to that on paragraph 26.
But I assure you that is not the case. At least not here and not on these type of forums. Now YouTube and such...yeah, ok, I will own that title and have little patience suffering fools! And I get the fun part of REALLY letting loose as an anonymous person, thus ensuring no fear of retribution
I have always been under the impression while having absolutely nothing credible to bring with it, that places like this and especially like this, brings with it a membership of people that are of higher moral fiber, intellect, and are all-around good and decent people!!! Yes I see the occasional crackhead researching something here to find out about one of their buddies, but I sure as heck don’t see them becoming a member!!! Course, every once in a while someone slips through like me...lol.
So if I do offend anyone, it’s only because I’m just trying to be very matter-of-fact and get to the point. I just said all of the above based on the very first sentence of my response below because as I wrote it I could see someone thinking I was being a smart *advertiser censored* and I truly am not!
Post: I just do not see the relevancy of that question at all and apparently you are not alone, was at least one other person interested as well. But I’m not sure what that proves?
It doesn’t really matter where it was parked the night he went missing or ANY other night after as well. The ONLY way it’s location could have an affect on the case “details” as we know them, details we are accepting at face value, meaning a solid belief they are credible enough to warrant the automatic acceptance of them (I do for many reasons) is if it was shipped out of state for repairs BEFORE he went missing and it did not return until AFTER the dogs hit on his scent.
This is because we have absolutely NO timeframe to go on whatsoever. The only thing we know as far as a timeframe is concerned is roughly when he went missing. That’s it. That’s all. So even though we are able to safely assume a lot of things about this case, up to and including a cause of death complete with a “walk away, case closed” conclusion, the one thing we don’t have a clue about is a timeframe. There is no evidence at all concerning one, much less something that could even vaguely be called conclusive.
We can speculate how long it took him to die from hypothermia, but no one will EVER know how long the body remained where it was until the hypothetical combine came along to dispose of it.
We are not even allowed the luxury to speculate on natural decomposition or animals scavenging, none of that would apply to the situation with the combine. His scent could have been picked up by just an ankle bone the combine hit.
The only aspect of a timeline that we can probably accurately detail with confidence, was he probably died within 24 hours of leaving his car, and his body remained in a certain location up until... it could have been that he died at one location and dogs brought his femur bone 25 miles away to the farmers field where his combine hit it and the dogs picked up the scent!
Also keep in mind they stated it was found on the FRONT of the combine, therefore we can safely assume he was NOT in the cab area as stated. But then again, one must allow for the very remote possibility that the cab was locked and no one was around with a key, so the dogs were unable to take it past that point. We don’t know the finer details of little things like that, but I’ll sleep good not knowing them as well.
I’m extremely happy having the rough, broad details on this case because so very very few have them! The case stands out amongst all of the others because so many out there were willing to take it 100 steps farther and provide us with those rough, yet eye-opening details. I’m OK guessing farmer John didn’t bother to lock that door.
I end by stating that it was extremely difficult for me not to utilize and dole out some much needed sarcasm and I for one would appreciate everyone displaying some empathy towards me for holding back and being a decent human and not revealing what a lowlife I can be!!!
My recent experiences bets a couple people out there will take my last paragraph seriously and will lash out and critique me for it : (