MN MN - Joann Bontjes, 21, body found, Martin County, 3 Oct 1975

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

academicla

New Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2019
Messages
5
Reaction score
13
Website
dps.alaska.gov
1*BO2ssPVf4OCq8ukWDCbAGw.jpeg


On October 3rd, 1975, the body of 21-year old JoAnn Bontjes was found in the ditch off Highway 4, halfway between Trimont and Sherburne, Minnesota. Her vehicle, a white 1974 Chevrolet Vega, was found abandoned a day earlier on the shoulder of the highway, just a mile and a half from where her body would be found. She had died of a single gunshot blast to her left temple. Her body was partially closed and bruised, as if she had been beaten prior to her death.

There is little information available online about this case. I would not know about Joann at all were it not for Don Mickelson, a retired police chief from a neighboring township who has spent the past five years of his retirement trying to find justice for this almost 50-year unsolved cold case. There are many strange inconsistencies and statements (or, lack thereof) I came across and agree that there is something very fishy going on here.

CBS Local Interview with Don
Don Mickelson's Justice for JoAnn Facebook Group
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, forgot to edit the title, correct title is:

Joann Bontjes, 21, Martin County, 3 Oct 1975

Clicking Report in my post, a Moderator can edit the title.

Thanks for bringing Ms. Bontjes to Websleuths!
 
April 4 2024

''New DNA Found At Scene of Young Minnesota Woman's Murder​

On Thursday the Martin County Sheriff’s Office issued a news release indicating they have submitted new evidence related to the murder of 21-year-old JoAnn Bontjes. ''​

''The evidence is an unknown DNA sample that was collected from the scene of the woman’s death with the assistance of the Minnesota BCA. ''
 

Attachments

  • 1712274073569.png
    1712274073569.png
    345.9 KB · Views: 6
Let's hope the DNA evidence nets some results.
From what I understand from the fb post a couple of weeks ago, the DNA sample came back designated as "Unknown" which usually means the person it is associated to is not in the "convicted offender index". It will remain in the "crime scene index" until the offender is convicted of a designated DNA offence or another crime scene sample is submitted. Not knowing the source of this sample, it is possible that the scene could have been cross contaminated at the time. Could be someone from the investigative team, my two cents.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
170
Guests online
217
Total visitors
387

Forum statistics

Threads
608,546
Messages
18,241,049
Members
234,397
Latest member
Napqueenxoxo
Back
Top