MO - Amy Vogt for sex abuse, child *advertiser censored*, Nixa, 2009

[smart blonde]

I have only one concern. Had the child been ill or had a rash? If the alleged mom was only showin the child's body under the covers, she may been inadvisedly trying to relieve her concern. A lot of it is going to be dependent on the conversation at the time and/or what she was actually doing.

Did they arrest the other woman?

(above bolding by smart blonde)

Even if this were the case (and I seriously doubt it was), you take the child to a doctor, you DO NOT expose his genitals on a webcam over the Internet. Period.

 

[2goldfish]

Here's our answer:

http://crimesceneinvestigations.blogspot.com/2009/12/nixa-woman-sentenced-to-federal-prison.html

"....Vogt pleaded guilty to receiving and distributing child *advertiser censored* and to possessing child *advertiser censored* in state court. In February 2009, FBI agents contacted Vogt after receiving an investigative lead that indicated she had e-mailed 15 images of child *advertiser censored* to an Illinois man, who was posing as a woman."

".....she broadcast herself via webcam molesting her son as he slept."

"Federal investigators discovered 139 images of child *advertiser censored* on a computer seized by FBI agents."


So, not the first time. Not to a female friend to ask about a worrisome rash. Pure child *advertiser censored* and abuse. Pure evil. The scariest thing of all is that she does, indeed, look sweet and innocent.

You know, Steadfast, I think all of us who are not abusers and can't wrap our minds around hurting or inappropriately touching a child, try our darnedest to make some sense out of any upsetting report. I thought exactly the same thing about a rash. I could see my adult daughter doing that with me--calling me and asking if I'd be willing to look at a rash on my granddaughter while she slept. You know, it's probably happened and there'd be nothing wrong with it. However, this was to a stranger and was obviously a pattern. My guess is that the feds found some pretty vile stuff.

I guess Amy will get lots of time to spend with her Bible.

that's a good link, scroll all the way down for the update - there was no rash or whatnot, she was absolutely molesting her son and distributing child *advertiser censored*. not just her own kid(s) either by the looks of it.