As a homicide survivor, I would never serve on a jury for a case like this. I am an advocate for victims of homicide. In this case, I don't know who the victim actually is, but I have compassion for Gypsy, if the investigation proves what most of us surmise to be true.
I hear what you're saying. I do. I just keep thinking that if the victim in this case weren't her mother, and if she had killed her herself, how would everyone feel then? If the girls held in Ohio had killed their captor would we be saying that even though they were captive victims they still belonged in prison?
This abuse started when Gypsy was 5 years old according to her mother's family. From the age of 5.
ETA--On the other hand, if you beat and abuse a dog until it becomes a killer, it still has to be put down. It's not the dog's fault, it was tortured, but it's beyond salvage now and must be destroyed. Since we're talking about a human being here, euthanasia is out of the question, but maybe imprisonment is the way to go. It's not Gypsy's fault that she is what she is, but society still has to be protected? Is that the correct way to look at this horrible situation?
ACK!! This case is tearing me up because I just DON'T KNOW and I usually have such a strong sense of black/white--no grey--in this case it's all GREY to me!!
It was all grey for me too until I realized she was pretending to be sick and/or disabled with her BF.. Of two yrs.
IMO there was no need for that - they killed DeeDee , so why was she still pretending??