I only found and read through this case today; had not heard of it. Am feeling disgusted by LE if they had determined that she is dead long ago, by the evidence in the house, that they have not charged this guy. More and more murders are being tried without a body and without as much (apparent) physical evidence, meaning they must have seen enough blood traces to determine that she had died. In NY, Cal Harris was convicted of killing his wife Michelle (as they were divorcing) with very little blood in the garage and house and she has never been found, and he was not acting as publicly guilty as this guy. What is the hold up??Do they think they could not get a verdict? I think jurors are getting more and more savvy...divorcing couple, wife vanishes, blood in house, iffy stories from husband almost always=he killed her. They won't get a confession and they may not find the body and he can't be allowed to benefit from hiding it so well.
Let's get this guy charged and quit messing around with those petty crimes he can't seem to stop committing before he hurts someone else, he obviously keeps getting out on bail. In this case, to me ,there is no innocent until proven guilty-IMO Sometimes they are just guilty.
