chaddylex
Verified local - Rebecca Stahl case
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2008
- Messages
- 3,177
- Reaction score
- 6,780
Hi Chaddylex,
Im not prepared to give up hope in this match at all.
For 20 years I worked in a field that demanded precise and accurate paper work. It was required that we double and triple check our work. Part of my job included verifying the accuracy of another persons work. Let me just say that I would find so many mistakes that sometimes it was beyond belief. And it wasnt necessarily because of incompetence; the mistakes could merely be a result of being interrupted and being under time constraints for deadlines. That being said, these profiles entered into a database can and quite possibly do have errors. I would never consider anything as the word of God that has been manually entered into a system.
As for the body scan not matching the memory of the family. I can tell you in my family, no two members will remember a family story the same way. What one member may remember their mother saying could have been a mothers exaggeration. I havent heard if medical records have been obtained to confirm the familys recollections, so I would tend to discount those as well, without solid confirmation.
All that being said, Im still holding out hope on this match too.
I was wondering too if some of the paperwork entered into Namus, about the UID's dental work could be wrong, or it might not have mentioned every physical characteristic that was found on the body, broken pelvis etc... (Cynthia's daughter stated the officer she spoke with thought the UID had a broken pelvis, but that doesn't mean that is was listed on the UID's Namus case file) Like Billylee has said, DNA doesn't lie... I am not giving up hope either until I hear from Cynthia's daughter or Tracey Lehmen that this UID has been ruled out as being Cynthia Day!