heartgoesout
Verified can just be typed in here.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2014
- Messages
- 4,627
- Reaction score
- 8,345
Can a mod answer if Pete is still in the verification process or if he will not be verified?
Did we ever confirm shift hours? For both part time and full time?
What business? QT? LE? Chrome?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Regarding murder... my top theories:Would it be beneficial to go over all possibilities again, including murder?
If Toni was murdered, then we have two choices: 1) bad luck 2) targeted
MOO speculation MOO
For this post, I will take the position that Toni was targeted for murder and then dumped.
Why?
Sex/drugs
Saw something
What else is possible?
That's an interesting possibility.
What if I were to tell you that police knew from the first week of the investigation that Toni was playing Pokemon Go? Would that convince you of an accident?
I had a few light-bulb moments last night...
Apparently NO! They say she is leaving qt and being followed but the actual video is her driving into the qt being followed by officer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can a mod answer if Pete is still in the verification process or if he will not be verified?
Can a mod answer if Pete is still in the verification process or if he will not be verified?
Did we ever confirm shift hours? For both part time and full time?
Can you expound upon this ? So are you saying police knew that she was actively playing or she had played in the past? And which one are they aware of. And also, how do you know this crucial information?
I did expand on it.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...as-City-15-Jan-2017-7&p=13283700#post13283700
Basically, I believe the officer that pulled Toni over knew she was playing Pokemon Go because he would have seen many other players do the same thing I believe Toni did, ie., make a quick trip down W. 26 Ave. to visit the pokestop.
I also have easy answers to all the questions. Why did she start playing again? Why keep it from Pete? Why play at 5 in the morning?
It all makes perfect sense.
I did expand on it.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...as-City-15-Jan-2017-7&p=13283700#post13283700
Basically, I believe the officer that pulled Toni over knew she was playing Pokemon Go because he would have seen many other players do the same thing I believe Toni did, ie., make a quick trip down W. 26 Ave. to visit the pokestop.
I also have easy answers to all the questions. Why did she start playing again? Why keep it from Pete? Why play at 5 in the morning?
It all makes perfect sense.
I did expand on it.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...as-City-15-Jan-2017-7&p=13283700#post13283700
Basically, I believe the officer that pulled Toni over knew she was playing Pokemon Go because he would have seen many other players do the same thing I believe Toni did, ie., make a quick trip down W. 26 Ave. to visit the pokestop.
I also have easy answers to all the questions. Why did she start playing again? Why keep it from Pete? Why play at 5 in the morning?
It all makes perfect sense.
If it was a simple accident LE would be releasing a lot of info because of all the implications of a "dirty cop". They don't want their agency portrayed that way. Why refuse to reveal information that dispels the "dirty cop" theory? I don't think either are the correct scenario. JMO