Where does this article say she's not from the US?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy using Tapatalk.
Neither the article or the video says anything about the mom not being from the U.S. that I can see.
Where does this article say she's not from the US?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy using Tapatalk.
From the same articleO/T - Did you guys catch the article in which the parents are now declining to be interviewed? Just friggen great. Prediction - they will pull the plug on the boys being interviewed on Friday. Just sad.
The couple's attorney disputed the police account and said Jeremy Irwin and Deborah Bradley, parents of 11-month-old Lisa Irwin, are not opposed to separate interviews. But they will not do what police requested, an unrestricted interview with no attorneys present, the attorney said.
Or he may have been ruthless because that's what he is. The speculation can swing both ways. A woman who has little education, no job or means of support such as DB is perfect prey for an abuser. Refusing to allow DB to be interviewed alone and not allowing the interviews of the boys are HUGE red flags.
JMO
How do we know this woman isn't from the US? We have people of all skin colors and name ethnicities and speaking accents here. Not to mention the sad (sad as in our own schools should be teaching second languages too!) fact that there are plenty of people in Europe and Asia who learn English as a second language early on in their schools and can often speak English better than native born Americans!
Whatevs, I think this has little to do with baby Lisa anyway. This woman is obviously knowledgable enough that she has a lawyer, and can handle questions from a reporter. If she wants visitation with her son, I'm sure she has been informed what she needs to do, now whether she can afford to or not is a different story. But either way, I don't see how it's pertinent to baby Lisa, except that some will use it as proof that dad is either a jerk that won't let his ex see her child, or that dad is a saint saving his son from an unfit mother. Both are pure speculation only, given how little information we have. :twocents:
I hope she gets full custody. I see love in her eyes and I trust her a lot more than in the Irwin home. MOO.
In reference to myself I don't IF JI is a jerk or not, but I feel for certain he isn't a saint...JMHO.
Or he may have been ruthless because that's what he is. The speculation can swing both ways. A woman who has little education, no job or means of support such as DB is perfect prey for an abuser. Refusing to allow DB to be interviewed alone and not allowing the interviews of the boys are HUGE red flags.
JMO
I posted this previously as well.Before we throw that "ruthless" comment around too much more, let's all remember that that was Peter Alexander that used that particular word, and therefore, we have no way of knowing if it was a direct quote from the ex's family, or if it was a paraphrase by a reporter.
JMO.
As to why RR has not seen her son in so long, let me remind you that most of us here know our rights. Many people don't, and it is rare for a judge to take the extra time to fully explain what his ruling means and any recourse available. As for the attorney, do we know how long she has had this attorney? Possibly her family retained him for her, as they were afraid of something even worse happening to her through the system if she was forced to have contact with JI through the courts again.
Debbies ex has not seen his son in 2 years. Jeremys ex hasnt seen her son in 2 years. I suppose This all started happening when debbie and jeremy hooked up. Hmm! moo. :waitasec: