IMO... d) none of the aboveRe: the kidnapping. So, my understanding of the grand jury phase is to determine if there is enough evidence for the case to go forward. The fact that there is a kidnapping charge implies that there is evidence of a kidnapping, correct? (Someone can clarify...I am not an attorney.) I am curious as to how they know she was kidnapped. Did they find evidence on/with her body? Did she text a friend that night to say that Brandon was taking her somewhere? Was a kidnapping evident on the convenience store surveillance video*? Law enforcement must have gotten this info somehow and it must have been very reliable.
MOO/my theory is that Ally texted a friend that she was being taken somewhere, or perhaps that Brandon was acting erratically and she was scared. Stay with me here...I always thought it was SO coincidental that an officer happened to check the lake area -- that specific spot -- and came upon her body a mere hours after she died. LE said it was a routine check of the area -- but was it really? Maybe this wasn't a coincidence...perhaps a friend received this weird text from Ally, and alerted authorities about it, which is why they went checking around the area. They seemed to home in on Brandon pretty quickly.
My other question -- what do you think of this "information" that Farese received the day before the bond hearing? What do you think it was? I wonder if they received notification that there was evidence that he kidnapped her, which would make it a capital case. MOO of course.
* I always thought it was strange that the surveillance video wasn't ever revealed. I believe a reporter asked for it early on. If the two of them had simply been on camera buying beer and cheetos, wouldn't it have been released like the video of Ally walking and texting in Oxford? I wonder if there was something incriminating on that video and the DA was just waiting to reveal it at the right time....again just my own supposition.
She was “kidnapped” because MS statutory code defines it as using persuasion, deception, flattery (inveigle) to entice someone to go somewhere willingly for nefarious purpose.
In MS, kidnapping elements include...
“Every person who, without lawful authority... inveigle... with intent... to cause a person to be secretly confined or imprisoned against his or her will... or to cause a person... to be deprived of his or her liberty... or in any way held to service against his or her will.”
I think he lured her to “talk”. In that remote location. Where there was no one to hear & no place to run.
MOO based on tidbits we have so far from LE & MSM.
Edited to add link explaining kidnapping in MS: Mississippi Kidnapping/Abduction Laws – Kidnapping