Find out his street name
They had 3 years to figure that out. JMO
Find out his street name
They had 3 years to figure that out. JMO
He has one. We all know it.
How does a family cheer outside the courthouse after a mistrial? Especially when they know he's in a gang, steals, deals drugs, and will be on trial for another womans murder? How do you cheer that???????????
From that night the gas tank appears to be off? or hanging. View attachment 124839
Thomas Womble, a prominent Mississippi attorney, told Fox News that he was predicting a hung jury, meaning a unanimous decision could not be reached.
"You got two very strong schools of thought out there," said Womble.
"Obviously this is a very emotional, heinous crime and everyone wants a conviction for someone. But on the flip side, this is an extremely difficult case based on the evidence that was out there," he said.
"If I’m preparing for trial, the first question you’ve got to ask is, 'Who's Eric?' That question never got answered," he said. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/10/16/jessica-chambers-murder-trial-jury-deliberations-under-way.html
The problem with this jury and with the Pinellas County jury and many others, is that they have to kick off any potential jurors who READ the news, WATCH the news, or DISCUSS the news with anyone. They need people who have no clue what is going on in their communities and the world around them.
So what kind of jurors are we left with? Usually people who admittedly have no interest in their community issues or news events. People who do not read or research anything.
So you get 12 people who did not understand what it means to come to a unanimous verdict before sending in the jury form.
ETA: I am NOT bashing this jury. Just discussing our pattern of choosing jurors who have no idea what is in the news and what the consequences of that are. n
It is my hope that the State will give more attention and creedance to the RN records at the Burn Unit and to the ME. Respectfully, with the extent of her burns, the tongue thickness, lack of oxygen, lack of lung expansion, understanding her would have been extremely difficult.
We want so badly to help and sometimes, in an emotionally charged, hellish, catastrophic situation, we think we hear something we really don't. Or someone tells us something and we think we heard it in the first person.
I am so sorry that there was not a verdict in this case. Hopefully, the retrial will be improved upon. IMO
I disagree.....strongly. That question WAS answered. There was testimony regarding the extensive investigation into anyone with that name who might have a connection to Jessica or the crime, and nothing was discovered. There was also testimony by the burn unit physician about Jessica's inability to speak clearly. And there was testimony regarding how that name might've gotten spread among the first responders in the chaos and trauma that night. How can that guy say it wasn't answered? This jury obviously had issues with comprehension, and a serious lack of critical thinking skills. That is the issue. The explanation given by Champion was quite clear, and it actually makes much more sense than Jessica having the ability to speak distinctly given the condition she was in. Simple common sense would tell you that much even without all the supporting testimony.
I just do not understand how something so relatively straightforward has been turned into such a huge,debatable issue. All the jury had to do was look at the photos of Jessica's injuries, and think about what they meant to her ability to communicate clearly.
I believe that's the muffler. They are usually held up by rubber joints attached to hooks on the muffler for expansive and vibration control.
I edited my last post to include LE's statement about the rear end damage;
"Champion said visible damage to the trunk that can be seen in photos of the burned vehicle was caused by investigators accessing the trunk. The key mechanism was so badly burned that it took force to get into the trunk, he said."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/02/17/burned-teen-whereabouts-last-day/23568509/
in light of what I heard from the jury today....i now wonder if when the defense atty called her Ericka Chambers three times...if they even noticed?