Could the reason that they are not wearing any underwear be because they were abducted suddenly from the campgrounds? I'm thinking they were sleeping or making love when someone(s) confronted them and told them to hurry up and dress and then they were taken and murdered.
If this a possibility then I think the KOA guy could have set them up. This case haunts me and I just want them to have their names back. At least they will never be forgotten because I know we will never let that happen........
Nyla, You just may be on to something..A very good possibility, imo.
Just maybe someone surprised the couple at the KOA, forced them to quickly put on their shorts and jeans and go with them...of course they could have been shot once at their camp/or in their trailer or in someones' home or taken by surprise at the camp 'showers' late that evening.
Another theory I have is because of Jane's shoes and manicures, that Jock and Jane was/had been visiting someone Sunday.
It doesn't make any sense to me, this couple would be at the KOA for the second time, staying 2 weeks and NOT make friends or visit with new friends there...
we know they were friendly with a workers husband, David B..who else did they meet in the area? My first guess would be L. Henrys son...
I agree, Nyla,
David B. knew the couple was from far away, that Jock had a large roll of money with him and learned a lot about this couple while playing pool, talking and possibly checking the KOA camp records.
I suspect David knew a lot more about the couple than was ever told to the investigator. Of course it's my opinion, the investigator didn't ask many questions, since he NEVER followed-up on what David told him.
Did anyone ever find out where David B. worked and what type of work? Correct me if I'm wrong, his wife was who worked at the KOA..
Jane had a large suitcase which tells me they had a vehicle.
Jock could have been driving a hot, new car. Remember he was possibly a racing fan. Attending races wasn't 'cheap'.
One can only guess what Jock and Jane were camping in, ....They were not dressed like they were 'roughing it', and very clean...imo
This couple had 'something' a man or men wanted bad enough to murder 2 people to get it....:twocents:..We know it wasn't their jewelry...
what could it have been, money, drugs, car, Van, camper, a yacht or boat or information on who was heading-up the illegal activities in that area, or some of it all, and WHO got their possessions and where did they sell them??
My question still remains, why would Le 'cover' for these 'guys' all these years? Was Henry or Batson an informant or something more to Le?..
We know Le already knew Henry...:cop:.. did Henry know something on LE or was involved in something with them as a trucker, that allowed him to walk away from a felony and more?
Another thought is: Ever think, the cover-up was not to cover up who murdered the couple, but instead, who the couple may have been...
related to, working for, as in drugs or working Undercover or what they OWNED.... IF found out, their names would lead back to what they were murdered for ?
so the leads are not followed up and the case goes cold..:Crown: