jmflu
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 1,404
- Reaction score
- 0
I find it interesting that there are folks that automatically assume that all the affiants are lying while they have nothing truly to gain by lying, or at most they can save face or have their story heard, but they are not central players and their lives or their children's futures are not at risk.
Yet, these same folks seem to think that the key person, who has the most to lose, who is statistically the most likely to have perpetrated a crime is the most likely to be truthful.
I am totally OK with innocent until proven guilty - but we're not applying this the same to the defendant and the affiants - we're not applying the same scrutiny to them, and we're not viewing them ALL with the same level of skepticism.
Odd.
I have thought the EXACT SAME THING! It is so ODD that some people would rather ignore the person who really looks guilty and instead, think the truthful ones are the guilty party!!!