Blink34
Former Member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2008
- Messages
- 5,476
- Reaction score
- 9
While I don't want to be argumentative, I do feel that I should reiterate that the Chief said that she's had no reports to indicate that this was anything other than an isolated incident. She did not catagorically declare it such because until the evidence has been examined, she could have a suspicion, but she'd have no way of knowing for sure.
Yes, there may be nothing to indicate that someone has been preying specifically on the women of Cary, but nationwide, female joggers are sometimes killed in "isolated incidents" and a mobile serial killer would also leave a string of "isolated incidents", up and down the road.
(Again, this is not to say that Brad might not have done it, but the Chief expressed an opinion based on the limited information she had available and I'm sure she repeated it several times, as a way to apply pressure to the logical first suspect, the victim's husband)
The whole thing is a word game and sometimes what most people hear isn't what's actually being said.
To Magistrars point- part of the problem is the press- when they update current stories, I find they RARELY, update incorrect facts, and get statements incorrectly AND quote each others articles, again even if they are incorrect. I think in the context they are looking into add'l suspects they are actually cya, as this is a common defense, or they are looking at accessories before and or after the fact..imo