Hi, LaLaw
I have to disagree with you about Dr. K. I have seen and watched him for years, and I think he is the single most unbiased forensic specialist I have ever seen.
If he were to be hired by a defense, I believe he would give the most favorable (yet still honest) opinion he could for his client; however, I am very confident that he would NOT lie as we've seen with Henry Lee, Baden and others. When the prosecution got its turn, he would answer truthfully, even if it didn't help his client.
On Nancy's show, she will often ask him what something means and what innocent or alternate explanations there might be for it. Then she'll jump on him for answering exactly as she'd asked him to do. She does that with a lot of her guests, I've noticed! :crazy:
Like I said last night, I could be wrong about Dr. K., but I truly believe he is a very honorable and earnest man who would never sully his reputation or sell his soul for money or fame. So many of the experts pervert the truth til there is nothing left of it, and some are willing to blatantly lie for their paycheck. I would eat my hat -- better yet, LP's hat -- if Dr. K. ever did such a thing.
I hope he never lets me down in that way. I would lose faith not only in him, but in the whole of hired expert testimony (and I have
very little faith in paid experts as it is). I don't mean to be contrary...please don't think I'm arguing. I just hate to see someone I believe to be a truly good and honest man thought of in terms that I think don't apply to him.
If you're not familiar with him, I'd just ask you to give him the benefit of the doubt til he does something nasty (then I'll help beat him up myself!).
:blowkiss: