TxLady2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2008
- Messages
- 8,099
- Reaction score
- 1,632
I am just catching up with the thread and it has probably been answered but I loved the comment and I'm happy SS reiterated it:blowkiss: It got me laughing.
What the guy meant was simply that it is considered relatively easy to get an indictment. Those who work in the legal system are not awestruck by it...it's not cause for congrats!!! or Wow!!!super job. I mean think about it...it is the prosecution working unopposed. Quite often it is the less experienced prosecutors who put cases through the grand jury. The rules of evidence are not followed, there is no opposing counsel, and by law, there is no public audience. if they make a mistake, it is behind closed doors. It's as low pressure as it gets in criminal justice.
Sometimes, it can be embarrassing if a prosecutor doesn't get the indictment. After all, if you lose, nobody even beat you. You lost without opposition. :blush:
Hence the saying, you can indict a ham sandwich....as in it aint that hard.
:blowkiss:
That being said, it will be huge cause for celebration when Casey is indicted. (Nothing about this case is normal).
I predict an inordinate amount of HIGH FIVES! :highfive: iykwim...
Did you notice the attorney the other night who said she had been given several "no bills?" NG was surprised and said she had never had any no bills.
IMO, if a DA puts a case before the GJ and it is handed down a no bill, then he/she must not have had a very good case to start with... no evidence to speak of. I don't think that will be the case this time... I think this one will definitely be an indictment. Only thing I'm worried about is that they said Tues. was this GJ's last day... how are they going to hear the entire thing in one day, UNLESS they have some slam-dunk evidence that we don't know about!