It’s quite possible they did find trace evidence on the backpack or its contents when it was recovered in 2001. It was wrapped in garbage bags and was found a year later as opposed to longer. They probably kept the sample of whatever they found stored away until the technology behind DNA advanced. This has happened in various cases that were solved using DNA over the last few years.Does this mean that hypothetically, the police could have found DNA on the buried items, then identified a suspect in an unknown way, confirmed the DNA somehow, then got a search warrant based on a DNA match?
They would only be able to search with probable cause like a DNA match, correct?
No, I don't think there is anything new about that girl. With all the crazy rumors flying around since the news of the search there was claims she had been identified, but seems like this was just false info.Not much has been mentioned regarding the pic. of this UID girl which was found with the books etc., did i miss something new about her?
View attachment 530819
Warrants were based on PHYSICAL evidence.... the found bookbag or it's contents maybe (?)