GUILTY NC - Jason Corbett, 39, murdered in his Wallburg home, 2 Aug 2015 #7

[irishmartin]

In the daily mail article (sorry can't post ss) it says




I like this the most makes me think they are nervous





Think the lead detectives will bring the search warrants and their content forward

And the statements of the accused and prob other present in the house on the night of the murder

 

[irishmartin]

If you read posts on thread you will find neighbour testimony on the day of the homicide.
Who would flag her? Jason is dead and her folks are not talking..
Re why not an insanity plea? I imagine the answer to that lies in Dumbfounded's most eloquent post.
I submit that it was their full intention to walk away unblemished socially, financially or professionally..
the stigma of mental illness could be a sensitive matter with them and could possibly also affect future financial acquisitions? Maybe?

I would imagine there was a plea bargain which we or the trial judge won’t know till after the trial. If I was their lawyer I would have sought terms but if too high then one has to take the risk. For TM 20yrs he would die in prison and for MM would be elderly then without SM and no future

 

[irishmartin]

https://www.facebook.com/TheIrishMail/posts/1940423919548483

The print is too small to read. Can anyone help identify the <modsnip> woman inset next to MM - is that Ms Lowry from yesterday's testimony? And the <modsnip> woman in sunglasses walking with TM is that SM? Thank you.

yes indeed and a very aged troubled SM

 

[Angelswatchingover]

You say there is no good reason for withholding in the US press the information about blood spatter found on, in, and around the bed. To some this is evidence of Jason being ambushed; however to others, the implication is that TM rescued MM from a deadly sexual assault. I mean, what could trigger a father's rage more rapidly than that? Almost every news outlet in the US has policies about what can be reported, so those tweeting from court may have had to seek guidance pertaining to this issue. IMO I can see the defense using this as a strategy and moving in this direction. Get ready. Please don't shoot the messenger.

The correspondent for the Irish Daily Mail is simple lovely. Smart, attractive, and quite poised in the video I saw of her. IMO

Deadly sexual Assualt!!! <modsnip>
If that was the case, Than wouldnt TM the monster have rang 911 screaming down the phone i had to stop him he was sexually assualting her , she would have ripped pjs, she would have gone to the hospital to be examined for jasons semen.. First thing she would have saod was he was sexualky attacking me i said no he choked me..Jason was leaving her, dont think he wanted to have sexual relations with her...
IMO..Facts MMwent to a solicitor asked could she get the children if she divorced J she was told no, only if proof of Dv..She started putting her plan into action, i wouldnt be surprised if she taped arguments between them for ladt 2 yrs that she instigated to start collect her proof.starting telling lies to friends..but fri night J told her that he was gone finished with her she rings mommy and daddy to come put her false dv allegations into frutation, tells him she has proof she is taking the kids with her mom and dad next day, thats why id say jason went and got jack to keep them by his side.. Jason had answers for them, they werent getting the kids no matter what lies they manufactured ...they than MURDERED HIM

 

[irishmartin]

We have only heard , heard is a gross exaggeration in this case, the prosecution arguments.
It is the job of the blood spatter expert to determine how the attack played out, the force and velocity of the blows and the proximity of the assailants to the victim.. and hopefully identify which was the fatal blow and who inflicted it.

He makes the story of the massacre understandable through the use of angles, directions, where the blood fell, its type and the injury which is likely to have been caused by each blow.

It matters little what they testify.. scientific principles will out the truth. Its a pretty exacting science.

He is the third person that knows what happened and the sequence in that room that night.

His testimony is the most important testimony in that court, he is in effect a witness, like a cctv camera witnesses.

Blood Spatter witness is not just a prosecution witness but an expert witness in this case the best. His evidence is so overwhelming where do the defense starts without multiplying it further. Best case of defense is gloss over it go into denial like the clients. But the evidence of this is also corollaries JC being drugged and the damning evidence of it being MM prescription and the accused have not a mark. Wouldn’t like being their defense lawyer to get out of this for their clients sake.

 

[stephanddoody]

[video=twitter;893112033532575744]https://twitter.com/lexdispatchbc/status/893112033532575744[/video]
Spatter on inside of Martens boxers and bottom of Molly's pajamas confirm at one point, they were above Jason Corbett when blows were struck

 

[stephanddoody]

[video=twitter;893110879939698688]https://twitter.com/bobcostner/status/893110879939698688[/video]
Paver and bat were used to beat Jason Corbett in head, spatter on clothes of defendants indicate close proximity

[video=twitter;893110534815584257]https://twitter.com/bobcostner/status/893110534815584257[/video]
Blood spatter expert James Stuart testifies blood spatter & stains on paving brick not consistent w/single bow

[video=twitter;893112426480238592]https://twitter.com/lexdispatchbc/status/893112426480238592[/video]
Transfer stains and hair fragments on the bat confirm conclusion that the bat is consistent with impacting the head of Jason Corbett

 

[stephanddoody]

[FONT=&amp]https://twitter.com/LexDispatchBC/status/893112033532575744

[/FONT][FONT=&amp]Spatter on inside of Martens boxers and bottom of Molly's pajamas confirm at one point, they were above Jason Corbett when blows were struck

[/FONT][FONT=&amp]https://twitter.com/LexDispatchBC/status/893112033532575744

[/FONT][FONT=&amp]Meaning Jason Corbett's head was close to the ground when blows were struck[/FONT]

 

[stephanddoody]

Stephan why do you think MM friends are testifying? Is it over DV allegations?

Its on the Irish daily mail fido Not sure what their testimony will consist of

 

[irishmartin]

Can I ask something, and apologies if it's already answered. Would TM not have a gun? Wouldn't an FBI person generally have a gun, and if he heard an altercation would he not bring a gun with him?

TM had long since retired from the FBI and his weapon would have retired with him

 

[stephanddoody]

[FONT=&quot]https://twitter.com/LexDispatchBC/status/893121972045049856

[/FONT][FONT=&quot]
[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Defense has been asking questions for last 10 minutes, going over certain transfer stains and impact spatters with him


[/FONT][FONT=&quot]



[/FONT]

 

[Be true]

I wonder due to the fact yhat defense needs time to consider their case is there a plea deal on the table. Are they going to consider. Has public opinion and evidence so far made them back up an 're think - is there anything going to change the fact this is pointing overkill ?

Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk

 

[irishmartin]

I am wondering if the information about the location of the bat and the photos to prove it will be brought in to the testimony today. If true that it was stored in a gym bag located in the garage it is unlikely that TM, as a guest to the home, would know it's location.

page 93

http://bloximages.newyork1.vip.town...-11e5-814d-b3e7eac0168d/568efad5ea265.pdf.pdf

eta: Where was the garage located in relation to the master bedroom?

Don’t have links to it but earlier posts and newspapers reports state garage was in ground floor as living rooms with outside entrance only. I’m too confused the origin of the bat has not being sorted out. For TM either way it not in his favour prosecution could well argue he purchased bat for the purpose it was used and the fact he didn’t give to Jack that night shows he had an ulterior motive.

 

[Logic-lady]

I am wondering if the information about the location of the bat and the photos to prove it will be brought in to the testimony today. If true that it was stored in a gym bag located in the garage it is unlikely that TM, as a guest to the home, would know it's location.

page 93

http://bloximages.newyork1.vip.town...-11e5-814d-b3e7eac0168d/568efad5ea265.pdf.pdf

eta: Where was the garage located in relation to the master bedroom?

The internal access to the garage was directly across the hallway from the master suite. I agree it is unlikely that TM would have known its location.

 

[Electric Sheep]

[video=twitter;893110879939698688]https://twitter.com/bobcostner/status/893110879939698688[/video]
Paver and bat were used to beat Jason Corbett in head, spatter on clothes of defendants indicate close proximity

[video=twitter;893110534815584257]https://twitter.com/bobcostner/status/893110534815584257[/video]
Blood spatter expert James Stuart testifies blood spatter & stains on paving brick not consistent w/single bow

[video=twitter;893112426480238592]https://twitter.com/lexdispatchbc/status/893112426480238592[/video]
Transfer stains and hair fragments on the bat confirm conclusion that the bat is consistent with impacting the head of Jason Corbett

That would seem to rule out the wiping of the bat that we speculated about earlier.

 

[Logic-lady]

I wonder due to the fact yhat defense needs time to consider their case is there a plea deal on the table. Are they going to consider. Has public opinion and evidence so far made them back up an 're think - is there anything going to change the fact this is pointing overkill ?

Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk

I think they're recognising that putting TM alone on the stand isn't going to be enough to sway the jury IMO. Especially after the testimony of his work colleague, I think they have realised that the evidence is painting a grim picture of events that night and they need something major to get the jurors back on side. But would Molly withstand the cross?

 

[irishmartin]

I wonder due to the fact yhat defense needs time to consider their case is there a plea deal on the table. Are they going to consider. Has public opinion and evidence so far made them back up an 're think - is there anything going to change the fact this is pointing overkill ?

Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk

I would think the same big time but for TM and SM the fact they let it go to trial and the gory details out there means he will definitely now die in prison. Cant see DA settling down of 20yrs for TM and because lesser age of MM 30yrs.
or alternatively the defense times-out to come to terms with what is overwhelming evidence to try pick holes in it...not an easy task. Tricking at the edges wont deal with the overwhelming evidence of overkill and pre-planning to a degree

 

[Be true]

I think they're recognising that putting TM alone on the stand isn't going to be enough to sway the jury IMO. Especially after the testimony of his work colleague, I think they have realised that the evidence is painting a grim picture of events that night and they need something major to get the jurors back on side. But would Molly withstand the cross?

Defence lawyers are reputable. No matter how much she flatters her lashes or sticks out the foot tumour, if they see this ending in an embarrassing loss, I think they will be pushing for their clients to wake up and smell the coffee. Ship's got holes and its sinking !

Jmo

Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk

 

[stephanddoody]

[FONT=&amp]On Tuesday, the analyst said impact spatter was found on the bed, defense then asked him if he knew if the bed spread was moved
[/FONT][FONT=&amp]The analyst said he doesn't know if the bed spread was moved
[/FONT][FONT=&amp]Defense asks analyst if he usually gets reports from EMTs to get a sense of the blood stains on the scene. He does, but not in this case
[/FONT][FONT=&amp]Also, blood wasn't tested underneath the boxers or on the bottom of Molly's pajamas
[/FONT][FONT=&amp]The analyst said he identified those untested spotters by association with spatters that were tested
[/FONT][FONT=&amp]But he can't say with a scientific certainty that those untested areas were blood
[/FONT][FONT=&amp]Analyst says yes, but he never saw Martens wearing the boxers
[/FONT][FONT=&amp]So basically, defense was asking questions about the analysts methods
[/FONT][FONT=&quot]And of course, the analyst knows that the vacuum was moved, but he doesn't know who moved it[/FONT][FONT=&amp]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]


[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]
[/FONT]https://twitter.com/LexDispatchBC[FONT=&amp]

[/FONT]

 

[stephanddoody]

Well since neither Tom or Molly had any open wounds i would say the most logical conclusion is that it was Jasons blood unless it was strawberry syrup or something