Yes, I agree with all of that. But my issue with this time thing is that Grant's jury took 90 minutes to come to their decision. Probably less than that, if you factor in picking a foreperson, signing the form, etc.. So let's say 1 hour. And they also didn't discuss it before.
Where is there this huge difference b/w Grant and Amanda that I am missing?
So Grant was on tape at a couple more places. Amanda was also on tape buying bleach and dumping acid.
They don't know exactly what happened at the apartment, neither with Grant nor with Amanda.
They have Sha telling them she took the kids in the morning while BOTH Amanda and Grant were left inside the apartment.
They have Uhaul, etc., going to Amanda's sister's house.
They have pictures of Grant and Amanda smiling together.
THey have Karen's testimony.
They have them going out on the boat together.
All I am seeing is Grant and Amanda together, Grant and Amanda, Grant and Amanda.
So I am trying to understand this seeming discrepancy b/w Grant's jury and Amanda's jury.
Does it all come down to motive? (Grant had more motive and there is more evidence that he hated her?) That is the only conclusion I can come to. That this jury must think Amanda did not have as much motive as Grant, and therefore didn't participate as much (or at all?) as Grant did.
rincess:
