My humble opinions:
In regard to the woman who claimed knowledge on Facebook having pictures with the sheriff; I can't say it isn't concerning, but on its own, I don't think it necessarily suggests anything.
I would be absolutely baffled if this woman, who until recently was an officer in the US Army, who has previously been investigated in connection with political insurrection on 1/6, was a long-standing and visibly vocal opponent to this drag show, would have *any* direct involvement with this attack and then go on to post about it on social media(and even later, to appear on Steve Bannon's podcast). That would be either cataclysmic in its stupidity, destructive in its sheer narcissism, or a fine mix of both.
I don't think there's anything to directly suggest that the attack was meant to target the drag show, or that it was in response to it. I do believe that the drag show was significant, however. Maybe not direct motivation, but possibly a trigger of sorts, or just an opportunity. Something about the counter protest acquiring a permit for between the hours of 5 and 7 sticks out to me, given the amount of police on location to act as security? I can't really articulate the thought beyond that, but I just want to point that out.
I'd like to know what kind of damage was done to the gates of these stations and if they would have needed time to dismantle, or were simply rammed with a vehicle, as previously stated.
It could be all the books I've been reading on domestic terrorism recently, but I wouldn't expect any individual or group to claim responsibility. You get that type of communication from ISIS, or ALF/ELF. But say we're dealing with far right extremism here, and it's very unlikely you'd get a group speaking up. Far more likely to be a leaderless resistance kinda deal.
Again, just some opinions.