sundrop
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 927
- Reaction score
- 38
For sure semen does not have a date or time stamped on it. There was DNA (semen) on the victim that was not collected by NC medical examiner’s office. Having access to this evidence and being able to compare it to the vaginal swab that was tested would have been most interesting. Without testing and comparisons one can’t make the assumptions that it would have been the same DNA profile.
Also, finding unknown male DNA in a number of locations at the crime scene and running that through CODIS may have produced a hit. Certainly, the defense should have been given the opportunity to have this done.
Beyond the above, the social background of Kathryn has never been investigated. Overall, the defense did a poor job in this case.
Also, finding unknown male DNA in a number of locations at the crime scene and running that through CODIS may have produced a hit. Certainly, the defense should have been given the opportunity to have this done.
Beyond the above, the social background of Kathryn has never been investigated. Overall, the defense did a poor job in this case.