- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Messages
- 55,637
- Reaction score
- 192,598
Sorry, did not know. Will do!
Shouldn't your post edit out his name, I thought WS was complying with the court order.
Why would they keep name suppression? Especially when it was denied originally
We are just waiting for the judgement on the name suppression issue
It's taking a bit longer than I would have thought
Yes and no. It's in place till the judge gives his ruling.It was heard on 7th February , and the judge decided to keep it in place
Murder accused naming decision reserved
It was heard on 7th February , and the judge decided to keep it in place
Murder accused naming decision reserved
I wonder if that could be because of some previous trouble he may have been in.Grace Millane's alleged killer keeps his name suppressed
The man accused of killing English backpacker Grace Millane in December has been allowed by a judge to keep his name suppressed.
The man, now aged 27, appeared in the High Court at Auckland last month, arguing for continued name suppression.
Justice Simon Moore released his decision today.
As well as ordering the continued non-publication of his name, the reasons behind the decision are also suppressed.
“I have done so because I am satisfied the publication of the defendant’s name would create a real risk of prejudice to the defendant’s fair trial rights,” Justice Moore said of the continued suppression order.
[...]
I wonder if that could be because of some previous trouble he may have been in.
What else may be a "real risk" of prejudice to his rights to a fair trial?
Have there been any updates on this at all? Can't see any online but sometimes there's a presence on local tele that doesn't get to broader international channels.
Just had a weird thought of ol' Grace as I'm about to head off overseas again too. Ah man.