Sunshine 1950
Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2009
- Messages
- 451
- Reaction score
- 106
Estrada told me he felt the girls were drunk..but I just don't believe it. And it didn't say that in the autopsy report. That report say that Mattie had eatten what appeared to be watermelon, apple pie, and she had drank a cherry coke. Patty's autopsy doesnt' say anything about what was in her stomach. So I just thin that report and autopsy are lacking...mainly due to the fact Dr. Haynes did it at the West Funeral Home and they didn't do much back then.Legacy, thanks for all the articles. Good work!
My eyes aren't so great at reading the small print either, so what I do is to save the image as a photo in windows pictures and fax, then I can enlarge the image of the article with that program.
Any clue as to whom the 33 yr. old guy was who had the scratches on his face?
Now I see where the reports mentioning a small caliber weapon came from---a suspected .32. With no bullets retrieved, I'm guessing the impact to the skull was how they later came up with the weapon being a .38. Still, lots of questions here. That bit about finding a mutilated blow up doll a month earlier was truly weird. How do you mutilate a blow up doll other than by punching holes in it or slicing the plastic?
Surely someone knew of someone who owned such a doll.
What kind of credentials did Haynes have to support his findings? Did he have a background in forensics? I feel sure we could find that out.
I'm not sure I buy that the girls weren't beaten. For them to be shot in the temple so close as to leave gun powder residue tells me they had to have been incapacited, likely unconscious when they were shot. I wish we had a diagram of the crime scene with the placement of each girl's body in relation to the road that Melton and Blair were driving on when Mattie's body was spotted.
So it makes me think Dr Haynes wasn't that experienced in murder autopsies.