Bolded by me, ChezhireThere was a red flag by the second night with no Caylee and no KC, as Caylee had never been out of the house for 2 nights in a row in almost 3 years.
There was a red flag the very first time that CA asked to speak to Caylee and was refused.
Maybe KC was a good mother in the early days, but CA knows that those days were long gone. CA even thought KC to be a sociopath. Red flag.
July 3rd. "My Caylee is Missing". Red flag.
Of course there were red flags, but no one thinks MURDER.
There was no reason to think the child was dead, until July 15th.
Who would think that their daughter isn't letting them talk to their grandchild because she is dead? CA thought it was one of KC's games and she was just being mean because she could be, she had Caylee.
So, yes there were unusual things happening, but who would think murder?
That thought must take a long time to sink in and I think we saw CA when she broke. She was like walking death. She is revived and today stated that she wants to know what happened. I don't doubt for a minute that she wanted to die. But, she has found reason to go on living as has GA, despite knowing that their grandchild was murdered and their daughter may be sentenced to execution. They have decided to see this to the end, together, no matter how painful it is. They want to know what happened and I hope that their marriage will grow stronger. Forged in steel and all that.
But I just don't think that CA or GA had any reason to think that KC would kill Caylee. It was not even a thought.
I hope LA can have a good life without being branded because he happens to be KC's brother. How many women are out there who want to marry a guy whose sister is on death row for murdering her baby? I think the line is short.
Execution ruins families for generations. The stigma of execution is carried far into the future for the entire extended family thus the murderer does even more damage, by shaming her family long after she is executed. It serves no real purpose to kill her. Life. Let her grow up and old and die on God's time, even if in prison. She needs a long time, maybe a lifetime, to reflect and do pennance.
Part of the problems I see on this thread is that posts are lumping what Cindy knew together w/ what George knew between June 15 and July 15. George knew what that car smelled like as early as June 24, 2008, when he stood right next to it when he and Casey argued about the gas cans, which smell should have raised some BIG RED FLAGS in his mind...
Bolded by me, ChezhireSnipped [from DotsEyes, above].
Exactly! CA is not saying that she was never concerned or suspicious about where KC and Caylee were or why KC always had an excuse for not letting her speak to Caylee. She's saying that there was no red flag between June 16 and July 15 that would make her think Caylee was dead.
Is there anyone on this forum who can honestly say that if their son or daughter started avoiding them, or giving excuses why they couldn't see a grandchild, that this would make you suspect that the child had been murdered by your son/daughter? I'll be amazed if there is!
They say hindsight is a wonderful thing, but it must be hell for the A's. They will most probably forever torture themselves with the 'what ifs' and the 'if onlys', but I don't see how any of KC's behaviour before June 16 can be said to indicate that she was a murderer-in-waiting, or that the A's should have been able to recognise this. As for June 16 and after, the tragic fact is that Caylee was already gone before the first 'red flag' had had time to unfurl.
Though I don't disagree with the above posts closing statement, that by the time the first "red flag" had appeared in the time frame June 15 - July 15, Caylee was alreay deceased, I disagree with the above statement that "she [Cindy] is saying that there was no red flag between June 15 and July 15" to the extent that Cindy was speaking for she and George, as George knew something was terribly wrong as of June 24, 2008, at the very latest.
Bolded and underlined by me, Chezhire.I agree Devon.
There was nothing during that first month to even make them think that Caylee had "disappeared" i.e. out of Casey's possession, much less been murdered (by anyone.)
I'm not sure about Casey actually being the murderer, it will have to be proved at trial. Of course I know how many people have already latched on very firmly to that theory and it's been repeated so much that a lot of people consider it a fact, and I can't rule out the possibility entirely myself, but we'll have to see at trial if there really is the evidence showing it had to be Casey as murderer, not a boyfriend or whoever else. I know most people's views here, no need to bog the board down with all the theory regarding Casey as murderer and so on, we all know the theory very well, we can return to the topic at hand, but just thanking you for your post about the A's never dreaming during the first 31 days that Caylee had come to harm at all, or even for some time after that, much less by Casey's hand!
Again, I disagree with the use of the word "them," as bolded, as George A. knew what that car smelled like on June 24, 2008, at the very latest.
As far as the above post's bolded & underlined comment that "...we'll have to see at trial if there really is the evidence showing it had to be Casey as murderer, not a boyfriend or whoever else...," this is an incorrect statement in terms of the law and the State's burden. The State simly has to put on evidence sufficient to convince a jury of 12 that Casey did it - the State does NOT have to disprove that others, such as "...a boyfriend or whoever else,..." didn't do it. In fact, it's Casey's defense team's job to try to offer some sort of defense, along the lines of either sticking to the "Casey couldn't have done it & here's why" plotline or the "Someone else did it and here's why" plotline.