RIP dear Lindsay.
Does anyone know why only one or two of the stories are printing that only her legs were found? Most of the stories make it sound like they found more remains than that.
I'm not sure exactly why they wouldn't report it. I suppose it could be that the details came out later so they just went with what they had.
My guess is they left it out on purpose though, either since the family wasn't telling news the details so they went with their wishes, or just because it was 'too much' info for tv news show?
From one article (that has no specific mention of what was found) there is enough info there that I think the news already knew the remains were her legs. It has quotes about 'partial remains', no facial characteristics or fingerprints to go on, etc. Seems to me like they just didn't want to say the details.
This article is the one I mentioned above
http://news10now.com/content/all_ne...oman-s-remains-found-in-illinois/Default.aspx
All that was found on I-55, 15 miles south of Springfield, was her legs.
Two area teens out on ATVs found one leg, the next day ISP and cadaver dogs discovered the 2nd leg. The leg bearing the tattoo was severed through the tattoo. The picture of the tattoo appeared in local appears hoping for an id.