sonjay
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2014
- Messages
- 3,608
- Reaction score
- 118
I think the truth will be a very precious commodity in this trial. The DA is stuck as whatever GJ testimony or other sworn statements will be stuck on the DA. I guess what he could do is just have K and A testify as they seem the most credible of anyone and prosecute based on the EN-perspective rather than trying to tell it from the Meyers-perspective. EN's defense can undermine K and A by saying their hearsay is an imperfect second-hand story, but I don't think they could be successfully gone after as engaging in any willful lies. It would be risky, but then the prosecution would only be left with using the Meyers for victim impact statements during the sentencing phase if there is one.
I can imagine the DA would like to do that. But he can't. If he doesn't call BM & KM, the defense will..... And then the jury will wonder why the prosecution didn't call them, and will wonder what he was trying to hide.