Really? What a valuable point...
LE has specifically said that
he is not a suspect or a person of interest so he should not be called a rapist or treated like KV's murderer- I thought this would be common sense:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/karina-vetrano-jogger-murder-sketch-released-of-man-who-may-have-info-nypd/
He is innocent until proven guilty- on the internet, in the "real world" and in court.
Obviously this can't and won't stop people spending hours comparing his sketch (which could be completely inaccurate) to sketches of suspects in other cases.
But, have you ever considered if someone spots the guy in the sketch or someone who resembles him in the "real world" and decides to serve out their own version of "natural justice" because on the internet they have seen people referring to him as a rapist and KV's murderer?!?
It may be the internet but wrongfully accusing people for crimes they have not committed on the internet can and has caused great harm in the past.
The case of Sunil Tripathi demonstrates the dangers of wrongfully accusing people on the internet:
http://www.cjr.org/analysis/sunil_tripathi_was_already_dead.php ;
http://www.thenewsminute.com/article/tigresses-roar-keralas-pulikali-dance-sees-women-actors-first-time-200-years-50026
As the article above states:
Actions do have consequences...even on the internet....