Was the bio-mom ever charged for taking the pornographic pictures ?
A Staten Island mother whose young son disappeared earlier this year and has yet to be found has been arrested for threatening a friend with a kitchen knife, authorities said.
Awww come on Jennifer. You're making it really hard for me to stick up for you.
and if I recall she had another run in arguing with another woman over a man a few short months after Patrick disappeared.
I suppose if she does time for this, it will be Child Service's fault if her daughter gets placed in foster care?
my more basic point has been that the bio mom has made a series of poor life choices over the years which apparently continue to this day. these decisions get state and city officials involved with her children and anything can happen.
I'm not excusing anything child services may have done with Patrick but bio mom's suit is not by any means a slam dunk. this continued behavior on her part (in my view) only bolster's the state's original decision to put the kids in foster care.
as for family members taking in her child or children, who knows how fit they are? child service records are ordinarily sealed and not publicly available. who knows if there are past or present files for the people bio mom wanted to entrust her children to?
and if I recall she had another run in arguing with another woman over a man a few short months after Patrick disappeared.
I suppose if she does time for this, it will be Child Service's fault if her daughter gets placed in foster care?
How can Patrick's mother sue the building management company about the security system? IIRC, wasn't there video of Patrick leaving the building?
How can Patrick's mother sue the building management company about the security system? IIRC, wasn't there video of Patrick leaving the building?
I thought there was video of her on the phone in the hallway of the building... (maybe thats the one we're both talking about?)... (I've also read several places that there are no cameras...)
But the only videos I'm finding after searching the net are just ones talking about Patrick's mother, and some of the early coverage. I cant even find the one you're talking about to see if we are speaking of the same one.
That's what the apartment complex is saying. There's no proof that something happened to Patrick inside the building. So saying that they are negligent for his disappearance is pointless.Well anyways... I think the lawsuit is complete carp. I'm not sure if the cameras from inside the building (working or not) would really be much help. (unless they showed someone scooping him up or someone disposing of him) I think it would be pretty gutsy to snatch a child in your own apt building & dispose of him there. From what I understand, the complex has it's own "police force" and there's always people milling about.
She's suing ACS and the foster mom, too. And the city.This is what I don't understand, why isn't she suing CPS & the foster mom? They were the one's responsible for Patrick's safety... (Of course, his mother was as well, and maybe if she would have thought about her decisions prior to Patrick being removed he'd be home, happy, and healthy tonight.)
(I'm not bashing her, I'm just saying maybe she should take a long hard look in the mirror before she blames anyone for what happened, because honestly, this was all avoidable.)
I really wish they would have further investigated the foster mother. I'm not saying she did anything to Patrick, but her story changed multiple times. She was, if nothing else, irresponsible in caring for Patrick.This is what I don't understand... Patrick's father says the foster mom's story doesn't sound right. ("Why would she take the child to the trash compactor when he was threatening to run away") That sounds right to me. If a child is threatening to run away you want to keep an eye on them. What I don't understand is why not just use the trash chute on your own floor instead of going down to the lobby?
Yeah!!! Nothing bothers me more than this video. This "sighting". I'm not on the "Jennifer did it" side of the fence, but if the family is hiding him, wouldn't that be a good reason to say, "Nope, not Patrick" in the video? Who is this woman?!?And then, there was video of a boy with a woman on the Staten Island ferry who fit Patrick's description, yet the family insisted that it wasn't him. Wouldn't it be reasonable to say, that it was possibly him, just to get it looked into?? (Maybe LE could have had a press release asking the woman to contact police so they could verify that it wasn't Patrick??) Seems to be a pretty big coincidence that a child fitting Patrick's description is seen on the ferry that happens to go to where his mom lives.