imstilla.grandma
Believer of Miracles
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2018
- Messages
- 33,176
- Reaction score
- 224,917
I wonder how many more skeletons are close by in those woods and trails that have still have not been found.
I said the same thing about Gilgo beach. Iam absolutely sure there are more around there .
The brand was established 11/92 and cancelled 05/99. I think we can rule out anyone missing before late '92/early '93.Images of clothing released
Sheriff’s office releases images of clothing worn in 2021 Chautauqua County skeletal remains case
The Sheriff’s office said the clothing worn by the unidentified person was initially sold in the early 90s and they are looking to see if anyone can identify the clothing worn.www.wivb.com
Jacque & Koko lable
JACQUE & KOKO Trademark - Registration Number 1734083 - Serial Number 74151611 :: Justia Trademarks
clothing; namely, suits, pantsuits, coats, wind-resistant jackets, raincoats, ski jackets, ski pants, parkas, jackets, blazers, ponchos, vests, shirts, tops, blouses, T-shirts, pullovers, sweaters, sweatshirts, sweatpants, tank tops, shells, halters, jumpsuits, jogging suits, rompers, overalls...trademarks.justia.com
So it looks like the brand would first have been sold during late 1992/early 1993 (ETA correct dates) and was defunct by 1999. It may have specialized in plus-size clothing, if the tag on Etsy is any indication, and according to this site was owned and/or sold by Lane Bryant, a plus-size women's clothing retailer.Images of clothing released
Sheriff’s office releases images of clothing worn in 2021 Chautauqua County skeletal remains case
The Sheriff’s office said the clothing worn by the unidentified person was initially sold in the early 90s and they are looking to see if anyone can identify the clothing worn.www.wivb.com
Jacque & Koko lable
JACQUE & KOKO Trademark - Registration Number 1734083 - Serial Number 74151611 :: Justia Trademarks
clothing; namely, suits, pantsuits, coats, wind-resistant jackets, raincoats, ski jackets, ski pants, parkas, jackets, blazers, ponchos, vests, shirts, tops, blouses, T-shirts, pullovers, sweaters, sweatshirts, sweatpants, tank tops, shells, halters, jumpsuits, jogging suits, rompers, overalls...trademarks.justia.com
The brand was established 11/92 and cancelled 05/99. I think we can rule out anyone missing before late '92/early '93.
So it looks like the brand would first have been sold during late 1992/early 1993 (ETA correct dates) and was defunct by 1999. It may have specialized in plus-size clothing, if the tag on Etsy is any indication, and according to this site was owned and/or sold by Lane Bryant, a plus-size women's clothing retailer.
I'm not an expert on women's sizes, but I knew woman that I would consider big but not overweight who wore size 8/10. The size on this shirt was 18/20; I would have to think that anyone wearing that size could be described as significantly overweight.So it looks like the brand would first have been sold during late 1992/early 1993 (ETA correct dates) and was defunct by 1999. It may have specialized in plus-size clothing, if the tag on Etsy is any indication, and according to this site was owned and/or sold by Lane Bryant, a plus-size women's clothing retailer.
From link, thanks..Images of clothing released
Sheriff’s office releases images of clothing worn in 2021 Chautauqua County skeletal remains case
The Sheriff’s office said the clothing worn by the unidentified person was initially sold in the early 90s and they are looking to see if anyone can identify the clothing worn.www.wivb.com
Jacque & Koko lable
JACQUE & KOKO Trademark - Registration Number 1734083 - Serial Number 74151611 :: Justia Trademarks
clothing; namely, suits, pantsuits, coats, wind-resistant jackets, raincoats, ski jackets, ski pants, parkas, jackets, blazers, ponchos, vests, shirts, tops, blouses, T-shirts, pullovers, sweaters, sweatshirts, sweatpants, tank tops, shells, halters, jumpsuits, jogging suits, rompers, overalls...trademarks.justia.com
I would also note that vanity sizing is a real thing so a size 8/10 in 1992 is not the same as a size 8/10 today!I'm not an expert on women's sizes, but I knew woman that I would consider big but not overweight who wore size 8/10. The size on this shirt was 18/20; I would have to think that anyone wearing that size could be described as significantly overweight.
The woman I knew who wore an 8/10 was someone I knew about 20 years ago, so maybe before vanity sizing kicked in, but I'd say she was about 5'7" and 150 lbs.—so she was "big" but a normal weight for her height and large frame. I would l think that someone wearing an 18/20 would have to be over 200 lbs.? Someone here would probably know better than I do.I would also note that vanity sizing is a real thing so a size 8/10 in 1992 is not the same as a size 8/10 today!
The woman I knew who wore an 8/10 was someone I knew about 20 years ago, so maybe before vanity sizing kicked in, but I'd say she was about 5'7" and 150 lbs.—so she was "big" but a normal weight for her height and large frame. I would l think that someone wearing an 18/20 would have to be over 200 lbs.? Someone here would probably know better than I do.
I believe it's an adult size, based on the other examples of J&K clothing sold online--plus, Lane Bryant stores do not sell youth sizes. There's no info on whether it was a "store brand" or one created to be sold in general retailers like Kohl's or Sears. I think it's probably the former.Yes, a person wearing an 18/20 likely weighs over 200 pounds. Most of my clothes are misses 14 or 16 right now, you can trust me on this.
BUT -- if this was a child/youth 18/20, we're all looking for a much smaller missing person.