what I still don't understand is
they know she is lying about many things including what happened to her daugther
not they think she is lying they know it for a fact.
she said an imaginary person took her for goodness sake
so how can she not be charged with something substanial
doesn't this set a very bad precedent for future missing children
they know she is lying about many things including what happened to her daugther
not they think she is lying they know it for a fact.
she said an imaginary person took her for goodness sake
so how can she not be charged with something substanial
doesn't this set a very bad precedent for future missing children